Suppr超能文献

评估酶免疫测定法(衣原体酶免疫测定)用于检测生殖道标本中的沙眼衣原体。

Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

作者信息

Taylor-Robinson D, Thomas B J, Osborn M F

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 1987 Feb;40(2):194-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.40.2.194.

Abstract

An enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis was evaluated on genital specimens from 96 men and 272 women attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases (STD clinic). Compared with a direct immunofluorescence test for chlamydial elementary bodies, the enzyme immunoassay had a sensitivity of 58% on specimens from men, a specificity of 90%, a positive predictive value of 93%, and a negative predictive value of 88%; the assay had a sensitivity of 67% on specimens from women, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 63% and a negative predictive value of 90%. Immunofluorescence provided the most stringent test for the performance of the enzyme immunoassay as values were improved a little when a cell culture procedure was used for comparison. Further evidence for the lack of sensitivity was the detection of elementary bodies, sometimes in large numbers, in the enzyme immunoassay buffer of 13 of 19 specimens that had given a negative enzyme immunoassay result and the finding in comparative titrations of four laboratory strains that the enzyme immunoassay was at least 100-fold less able to detect chlamydiae than either immunofluorescence or the cell culture procedure. Lack of specificity may be associated with the finding that the enzyme immunoassay antibody reacted with strains of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Escherichia coli, Gardnerella vaginalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and group B streptococci. The enzyme immunoassay was not considered to be sufficiently sensitive, specific, or reproducible for routine use.

摘要

采用酶免疫测定法(衣原体酶免疫测定法)对96名男性和272名女性性传播疾病门诊(性病门诊)患者的生殖器标本进行沙眼衣原体检测。与衣原体原体的直接免疫荧光检测相比,酶免疫测定法在男性标本上的灵敏度为58%,特异性为90%,阳性预测值为93%,阴性预测值为88%;该测定法在女性标本上的灵敏度为67%,特异性为89%,阳性预测值为63%,阴性预测值为90%。当使用细胞培养程序进行比较时,免疫荧光法为酶免疫测定法的性能提供了最严格的检测,因为其数值略有提高。酶免疫测定法灵敏度不足的进一步证据是,在19份酶免疫测定结果为阴性的标本中,有13份标本的酶免疫测定缓冲液中检测到原体,有时数量还很多;在对四种实验室菌株进行的比较滴定中发现,酶免疫测定法检测衣原体的能力比免疫荧光法或细胞培养程序至少低100倍。缺乏特异性可能与酶免疫测定抗体与醋酸钙不动杆菌、大肠杆菌、阴道加德纳菌、淋病奈瑟菌和B组链球菌菌株发生反应这一发现有关。酶免疫测定法在常规使用中被认为灵敏度、特异性或可重复性不足。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.沙眼的诊断与评估
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;17(4):982-1011, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.982-1011.2004.
7
Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.沙眼衣原体检测方法的比较评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1663-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1663-1666.1993.

本文引用的文献

8
Cross-reactivity between Chlamydiazyme and Acinetobacter strains.
N Engl J Med. 1986 Apr 3;314(14):922-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198604033141413.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验