Kozyrskyj Anita L, Dahl Matthew E, Chateau Dan G, Mazowita Garey B, Klassen Terry P, Law Barbara J
Department of Community Health Sciences, Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
CMAJ. 2004 Jul 20;171(2):139-45. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031629.
Evidence-based guidelines for antibiotic use are well established, but nonadherence to these guidelines continues. This study was undertaken to determine child, household and physician factors predictive of nonadherence to evidence-based antibiotic prescribing in children.
The prescription and health care records of 20 000 Manitoba children were assessed for 2 criteria of nonadherence to evidence-based antibiotic prescribing during the period from fiscal year 1996 (April 1996 to March 1997) to fiscal year 2000: receipt of an antibiotic for a viral respiratory tract infection (VRTI) and initial use of a second-line agent for acute otitis media, pharyngitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection or cellulitis. The likelihood of nonadherence to evidence-based prescribing, according to child demographic characteristics, physician factors (specialty and place of training) and household income, was determined from hierarchical linear modelling. Child visits were nested within physicians, and the most parsimonious model was selected at p < 0.05.
During the study period, 45% of physician visits for VRTI resulted in an antibiotic prescription, and 20% of antibiotic prescriptions were for second-line antibiotics. Relative to general practitioners, the odds ratio for antibiotic prescription for a VRTI was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.62) for pediatricians and 1.58 (95% CI 1.03-2.42) for other specialists. The likelihood that an antibiotic would be prescribed for a VRTI was 0.99 for each successive 10,000 Canadian dollars increase in household income. Pediatricians and other specialists were more likely than general practitioners to prescribe second-line antibiotics for initial therapy. Both criteria for nonadherence to evidence-based prescribing were 40% less likely among physicians trained in Canada or the United States than among physicians trained elsewhere.
The links that we identified between nonadherence to evidence-based antibiotic prescribing in children and physician specialty and location of training suggest opportunities for intervention. The independent effect of household income indicates that parents also have an important role.
基于证据的抗生素使用指南已完善确立,但对这些指南的不依从情况仍在持续。本研究旨在确定儿童、家庭及医生因素中可预测儿童不依从基于证据的抗生素处方的因素。
对20000名马尼托巴省儿童的处方和医疗记录进行评估,以确定1996财年(1996年4月至1997年3月)至2000财年期间不依从基于证据的抗生素处方的2项标准:因病毒性呼吸道感染(VRTI)接受抗生素治疗,以及对急性中耳炎、咽炎、肺炎、尿路感染或蜂窝织炎初始使用二线药物。根据儿童人口统计学特征、医生因素(专业及培训地点)和家庭收入,通过分层线性模型确定不依从基于证据的处方的可能性。儿童就诊情况嵌套于医生之中,在p<0.05时选择最简约模型。
在研究期间,45%因VRTI的医生就诊开具了抗生素处方,20%的抗生素处方为二线抗生素。相对于全科医生,儿科医生因VRTI开具抗生素处方的比值比为0.51(95%置信区间[CI]0.42 - 0.62),其他专科医生为1.58(95%CI 1.03 - 2.42)。家庭收入每连续增加10000加元,因VRTI开具抗生素处方的可能性为0.99。儿科医生和其他专科医生比全科医生更有可能在初始治疗时开具二线抗生素。在加拿大或美国接受培训 的医生,与在其他地方接受培训的医生相比,不依从基于证据的处方的两项标准的可能性均低40%。
我们确定的儿童不依从基于证据的抗生素处方与医生专业及培训地点之间的联系提示了干预机会。家庭收入的独立影响表明家长也发挥着重要作用。