Kaplan R M, Burke J M, Terrill T H, Miller J E, Getz W R, Mobini S, Valencia E, Williams M J, Williamson L H, Larsen M, Vatta A F
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Vet Parasitol. 2004 Aug 13;123(1-2):105-20. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.005.
Recent studies on sheep and goat farms in the southern United States indicate that multiple-anthelmintic resistance in Haemonchus contortus is becoming a severe problem. Though many factors are involved in the evolution of resistance, the proportion of the parasite population under drug selection is believed to be the single most important factor influencing how rapidly resistance develops. Therefore, where prevention of resistance is an important parallel goal of worm control, it is recommended to leave a portion of the animals untreated. Recently, a novel system called FAMACHA was developed in South Africa, which enables clinical identification of anemic sheep and goats. When H. contortus is the primary parasitic pathogen, this system can be applied on the farm level to reduce the number of treatments administered, thereby increasing the proportion of the worm population in refugia. Since most studies validating the FAMACHA method have been performed in South Africa, it is important that the method be tested in other regions before its use is broadly recommended. We performed a validation study of FAMACHA by testing the system in sheep (n = 847) and goats (n = 537) of various breeds and ages from 39 farms located in Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Florida, and the US Virgin Islands. The color of the ocular conjunctiva of all animals were scored on a 1-5 scale using the FAMACHA card, and blood samples were collected from each animal for determination of packed cell volume (PCV). Fecal samples were also collected from a majority of the animals tested for performance of fecal egg counts (FEC). Correlations between PCV and eye scores, PCV and FEC, and FEC and eye scores were all highly significant for both sheep and goats (P < 0.001). Data for both FAMACHA scores and PCV were evaluated using two separate criteria for anemia: eye score values of 3, 4 and 5 or 4 and 5, and PCV values of < or =19 or < or =15 were considered anemic. Specificity was maximized when eye score values of 4 and 5 were considered anemic and PCV cut off for anemia was < or =19, but sensitivity was low. In contrast, sensitivity was 100% for both sheep and goats when eye score values of 3, 4 and 5 were considered anemic and PCV cut off was < or =15, but specificity was low. In both sheep and goats, predictive value of a negative was greater than 92% for all anemia and eye score categories, and was greater than 99% for both eye score categories when an anemia cutoff of < or =15 was used. Predictive value of a positive test was low under all criteria indicating that many non-anemic animals would be treated using this system. However, compared to conventional dosing practices where all animals are treated, a large proportion of animals would still be left untreated. These data indicate that the FAMACHA method is an extremely useful tool for identifying anemic sheep and goats in the southern US and US Virgin Islands. However, further studies are required to determine optimal strategies for incorporating FAMACHA-based selective treatment protocols into integrated nematode control programs.
美国南部绵羊和山羊养殖场的近期研究表明,捻转血矛线虫对多种驱虫药产生抗性正成为一个严重问题。尽管抗性的演变涉及许多因素,但处于药物选择压力下的寄生虫种群比例被认为是影响抗性发展速度的唯一最重要因素。因此,在将预防抗性作为蠕虫控制的一个重要并行目标的地方,建议留出一部分动物不进行治疗。最近,南非开发了一种名为FAMACHA的新系统,可对贫血绵羊和山羊进行临床识别。当捻转血矛线虫是主要寄生病原体时,该系统可应用于农场层面,以减少给药次数,从而增加避难所中蠕虫种群的比例。由于验证FAMACHA方法的大多数研究是在南非进行的,因此在广泛推荐使用该方法之前,在其他地区对其进行测试很重要。我们通过对来自阿肯色州、佐治亚州、路易斯安那州、佛罗里达州和美属维尔京群岛39个农场的不同品种和年龄的绵羊(n = 847)和山羊(n = 537)进行测试,对FAMACHA进行了验证研究。使用FAMACHA卡片对所有动物的眼结膜颜色进行1 - 5分评分,并从每只动物采集血样以测定血细胞比容(PCV)。还从大多数受试动物采集粪便样本以进行粪便虫卵计数(FEC)。绵羊和山羊的PCV与眼部分数、PCV与FEC以及FEC与眼部分数之间均具有高度显著的相关性(P < 0.001)。使用两种不同的贫血标准对FAMACHA分数和PCV数据进行了评估:眼部分数值为3、4和5或4和5,以及PCV值≤19或≤15被视为贫血。当眼部分数值4和5被视为贫血且贫血的PCV临界值≤19时,特异性最大化,但敏感性较低。相比之下,当眼部分数值3、4和5被视为贫血且PCV临界值≤15时,绵羊和山羊的敏感性均为100%,但特异性较低。在绵羊和山羊中,对于所有贫血和眼部分数类别,阴性预测值均大于92%,当使用≤15的贫血临界值时,两个眼部分数类别的阴性预测值均大于99%。在所有标准下,阳性检测的预测值都很低,这表明使用该系统会治疗许多非贫血动物。然而,与对所有动物进行治疗的传统给药方法相比,仍有很大比例的动物将不进行治疗。这些数据表明,FAMACHA方法是识别美国南部和美属维尔京群岛贫血绵羊和山羊的极其有用的工具。然而,需要进一步研究以确定将基于FAMACHA的选择性治疗方案纳入综合线虫控制计划的最佳策略。