Suppr超能文献

美国东南部绵羊和山羊养殖户在农场使用FAMACHA系统的准确性。

Accuracy of the FAMACHA system for on-farm use by sheep and goat producers in the southeastern United States.

作者信息

Burke J M, Kaplan R M, Miller J E, Terrill T H, Getz W R, Mobini S, Valencia E, Williams M J, Williamson L H, Vatta A F

机构信息

Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, USDA, ARS, Booneville, AR 72927, USA.

出版信息

Vet Parasitol. 2007 Jun 20;147(1-2):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.03.033. Epub 2007 May 4.

Abstract

FAMACHA is a practical on-farm system designed to provide small ruminant producers a tool for improving their management of Haemonchus contortus infections. Although this system has become very popular and widely accepted by small ruminant producers in many regions of the southern United States, there is very limited data reported on the effectiveness of the FAMACHA system when performed by farmers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the FAMACHA system for on-farm use by small ruminant producers during the summer season. Small ruminant producers from Georgia, Louisiana, Florida, and Puerto Rico were trained to use the FAMACHA system by veterinarians and scientists experienced with this method. FAMACHA scores were assigned at least every 2 weeks by producers to weaned and mature sheep (n=552) and goats (n=676) of various breeds and ages between April and September 2004. At intervals that varied among farms from 2 to 8 weeks, researchers determined body condition scores (BCS; 1=thin and 5=fat) and collected blood and feces from a group of animals selected randomly to determine packed cell volume (PCV) and fecal egg counts (FEC). Two separate anemia thresholds were evaluated; these were defined by either FAMACHA score (>or=3 versus >or=4) or PCV (<or=19 versus <or=15%). The correlation between FAMACHA scores and PCV or FEC was high for both sheep and goats (P<0.001). Specificity was maximized when FAMACHA scores of 4 and 5 were considered anemic, but sensitivity was low. Sensitivity for detecting anemic animals was 50% for sheep and 89% for goats when eye score values of >or=3 were considered anemic and PCV cutoff was <or=15%. The percentage of false negatives (anemic animals not identified by FAMACHA evaluation) was less than 5% in sheep and less than 1% in goats when FAMACHA scores>or=3 were considered anemic and PCV cutoff was <or=15%. In both sheep and goats, predictive value of a negative was greater than 90% for all anemia and eye score categories. These data indicate that the FAMACHA method used by producers is a valuable tool for identifying anemic sheep and goats in the southern United States and Puerto Rico.

摘要

FAMACHA是一种实用的农场系统,旨在为小型反刍动物养殖户提供一种工具,以改善他们对捻转血矛线虫感染的管理。尽管该系统在美国南部许多地区已非常流行并被小型反刍动物养殖户广泛接受,但关于养殖户使用FAMACHA系统的有效性的报道数据非常有限。本研究的目的是评估FAMACHA系统在夏季供小型反刍动物养殖户在农场使用时的准确性。来自佐治亚州、路易斯安那州、佛罗里达州和波多黎各的小型反刍动物养殖户由熟悉该方法的兽医和科学家培训使用FAMACHA系统。2004年4月至9月期间,养殖户至少每2周对断奶和成年绵羊(n = 552)以及不同品种和年龄的山羊(n = 676)进行FAMACHA评分。在各农场间隔时间从2至8周不等,研究人员确定体况评分(BCS;1 = 瘦,5 = 胖),并从随机挑选的一组动物中采集血液和粪便,以确定红细胞压积(PCV)和粪便虫卵计数(FEC)。评估了两个不同的贫血阈值;这些阈值由FAMACHA评分(≥3对≥4)或PCV(≤19对≤15%)定义。绵羊和山羊的FAMACHA评分与PCV或FEC之间的相关性都很高(P < 0.001)。当将FAMACHA评分为4和5视为贫血时,特异性最高,但敏感性较低。当将眼观评分值≥3视为贫血且PCV临界值≤15%时,检测贫血动物的敏感性对于绵羊为50%,对于山羊为89%。当将FAMACHA评分≥3视为贫血且PCV临界值≤15%时,绵羊假阴性(未通过FAMACHA评估识别出的贫血动物)的百分比小于5%,山羊小于1%。在绵羊和山羊中,对于所有贫血和眼观评分类别,阴性预测值均大于90%。这些数据表明,养殖户使用的FAMACHA方法是在美国南部和波多黎各识别贫血绵羊和山羊的一种有价值的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验