• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FAMACHA 法在瑞士野外条件下检测山羊贫血和血矛线虫病的准确性。

The accuracy of the FAMACHA-method in detecting anaemia and haemonchosis in goat flocks in Switzerland under field conditions.

机构信息

Comparative Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Leopoldstr. 5, D-80802 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Vet Parasitol. 2010 May 28;170(1-2):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.035. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.035
PMID:20188478
Abstract

In this study, goats from six farms in Central Switzerland were examined for the evaluation of the FAMACHA-method under middle European conditions. Individual faecal egg counts were determined at a 4-week interval for a period of 6 months and the gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) genera were differentiated using larval culture. Simultaneously, the goats were bled for packed cell volume (PCV) determination and scored for anaemia of the conjunctiva according to the FAMACHA-method. The three methods used for evaluating haemonchosis, namely FEC, PCV and FAMACHA-score, were compared to test the FAMACHA-method for its accuracy and efficacy in detecting haemonchosis in Switzerland. PCV and FAMACHA-score correlated significantly during the entire period of 6 months, whereas PCV and FEC correlated significantly in four study months. The FAMACHA-score and FEC correlated significantly in June only. PCV served as the gold standard for evaluating the accuracy of FAMACHA-method in detecting anaemic goats. The sensitivity of FAMACHA in detecting anaemic goats was 93%, using the anaemia criteria cut-offs FAMACHA-categories >or=3 and PCV <22%. The applicability of the method for detecting goats which needed treatment was tested with FEC >300 epg and >600 epg as cut-off values for treatment. The sensitivity of the method for detecting goats which needed a treatment was 76%, with regard to FEC of Haemonchus contortus (treatment cut-offs: FAMACHA >or=3 and FEC >300 epg). The percentage of false negatives (FEC-Hc-portion) was less than 11%. In addition, the use of FAMACHA categories >or=3, as a treatment indicator, revealed that 64% of the animals were recommended for treatment. These results indicate the suitability of FAMACHA as an additional part of an integrated anthelmintic control of goat flocks in Switzerland.

摘要

在本研究中,检查了来自瑞士中部六个农场的山羊,以评估 FAMACHA 方法在中欧条件下的效果。在 6 个月的时间里,每隔 4 周测定一次个体粪便卵计数,并通过幼虫培养区分胃肠道线虫(GIN)属。同时,为了确定红细胞压积(PCV)并根据 FAMACHA 方法评估结膜贫血,给山羊采血并进行评分。使用三种方法评估血矛线虫病,即 FEC、PCV 和 FAMACHA 评分,以检验 FAMACHA 方法在瑞士检测血矛线虫病的准确性和效果。PCV 和 FAMACHA 评分在整个 6 个月期间均呈显著相关,而 PCV 和 FEC 在四个研究月份中呈显著相关。仅在 6 月时 FAMACHA 评分和 FEC 呈显著相关。PCV 用于评估 FAMACHA 方法检测贫血山羊的准确性。使用贫血标准截断值 FAMACHA 类别 >or=3 和 PCV <22%,FAMACHA 检测贫血山羊的灵敏度为 93%。使用 FEC >300 epg 和 >600 epg 作为治疗的截断值,检验该方法检测需要治疗的山羊的适用性。该方法检测需要治疗的山羊的灵敏度为 76%,对于捻转血矛线虫的 FEC(治疗截断值:FAMACHA >or=3 和 FEC >300 epg)。假阴性率(FEC-Hc-portion)低于 11%。此外,使用 FAMACHA 类别 >or=3 作为治疗指标表明,64%的动物被建议进行治疗。这些结果表明 FAMACHA 适合作为瑞士山羊群综合驱虫控制的一个附加部分。

相似文献

1
The accuracy of the FAMACHA-method in detecting anaemia and haemonchosis in goat flocks in Switzerland under field conditions.FAMACHA 法在瑞士野外条件下检测山羊贫血和血矛线虫病的准确性。
Vet Parasitol. 2010 May 28;170(1-2):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.035. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
2
Validation of the FAMACHA eye color chart for detecting clinical anemia in sheep and goats on farms in the southern United States.在美国南部农场用于检测绵羊和山羊临床贫血的FAMACHA眼结膜颜色图表的验证。
Vet Parasitol. 2004 Aug 13;123(1-2):105-20. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.005.
3
Accuracy of an anaemia scoring chart applied on goats in sub-humid Kenya and its potential for control of Haemonchus contortus infections.应用于肯尼亚半湿润地区山羊的贫血评分图表的准确性及其对捻转血矛线虫感染的控制潜力。
Vet Parasitol. 2006 Nov 5;141(3-4):291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.05.020. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
4
Accuracy of the FAMACHA system for on-farm use by sheep and goat producers in the southeastern United States.美国东南部绵羊和山羊养殖户在农场使用FAMACHA系统的准确性。
Vet Parasitol. 2007 Jun 20;147(1-2):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.03.033. Epub 2007 May 4.
5
Validation of the FAMACHA© eye colour chart using sensitivity/specificity analysis on two South African sheep farms.利用敏感性/特异性分析对南非两个绵羊养殖场的 FAMACHA©眼色素图进行验证。
Vet Parasitol. 2011 May 11;177(3-4):203-11. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.023. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
6
The FAMACHA system for managing haemonchosis in sheep and goats by clinically identifying individual animals for treatment.通过临床识别个体动物进行治疗来管理绵羊和山羊血矛线虫病的FAMACHA系统。
Vet Res. 2002 Sep-Oct;33(5):509-29. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2002036.
7
Sensitivity and specificity of the FAMACHA(©) system in Suffolk sheep and crossbred Boer goats.法马西亚(©)系统在萨福克绵羊和杂交布尔山羊中的敏感性和特异性。
Vet Parasitol. 2012 Nov 23;190(1-2):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
8
A comparison of two integrated approaches of controlling nematode parasites in small ruminants.两种控制小反刍动物线虫寄生虫综合方法的比较。
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Jun 10;178(3-4):300-10. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
9
[Experiences with the FAMACHA-Eye-Colour-Chart for identifying sheep and goats for targeted anthelmintic treatment].[使用FAMACHA眼结膜颜色图表识别绵羊和山羊以进行针对性驱虫治疗的经验]
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2006 Sep-Oct;119(9-10):436-42.
10
FAMACHA(©) method as an auxiliary strategy in the control of gastrointestinal helminthiasis of dairy goats under semiarid conditions of Northeastern Brazil.FAMACHA(©)方法作为一种辅助策略,用于控制巴西东北部半干旱条件下奶山羊的胃肠道寄生虫病。
Vet Parasitol. 2012 Nov 23;190(1-2):281-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Extensive Countrywide Molecular Identification and High Genetic Diversity of spp. in Domestic Ruminants in Greece.希腊国内反刍动物中 spp. 的广泛全国性分子鉴定及高遗传多样性
Pathogens. 2024 Mar 8;13(3):238. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13030238.
2
Relevance of Individual Data When Assessing the Gastrointestinal Nematode Infection Level, Nutritional and Productive Variables in a Tropical Farm Context: The Median Isn't the Message.在热带农场环境中评估胃肠道线虫感染水平、营养和生产变量时个体数据的相关性:中位数并非关键所在。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 12;14(4):603. doi: 10.3390/ani14040603.
3
Ovine gastrointestinal parasite burden and the impact of strategic anthelmintic treatment in community-based breeding sites in Ethiopia.
埃塞俄比亚社区繁育点绵羊胃肠道寄生虫负荷及驱虫战略治疗的影响
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Mar 21;10:1094672. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1094672. eCollection 2023.
4
Prevalence and resistance to gastrointestinal parasites in goats: A review.山羊胃肠道寄生虫的流行情况及耐药性:综述
Vet World. 2022 Oct;15(10):2442-2452. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.2442-2452. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
5
Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats.基于动物的山羊农场福利评估指标
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 2;11(11):3138. doi: 10.3390/ani11113138.
6
Relationships between Body Condition Score (BCS), FAMACHA©-Score and Haematological Parameters in Alpacas and Llamas Presented at the Veterinary Clinic.兽医诊所中羊驼和美洲驼的体况评分(BCS)、FAMACHA©评分与血液学参数之间的关系
Animals (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;11(9):2517. doi: 10.3390/ani11092517.
7
Variables of initial examination and clinical management associated with survival in small ruminants with obstructive urolithiasis.与阻塞性尿路结石的小型反刍动物生存相关的初始检查和临床管理变量。
J Vet Intern Med. 2018 Nov;32(6):2105-2114. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15336. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
The genetic basis for the selection of dairy goats with enhanced resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes.选择对胃肠道线虫具有增强抗性的奶山羊的遗传基础。
Parasite. 2017;24:32. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2017033. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
9
Physio-biochemical parameters: a potential tool for target-selective treatment of haemonchosis in the small ruminants.生理生化参数:一种用于小反刍动物血矛线虫病靶向选择性治疗的潜在工具。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017 Dec;49(8):1577-1589. doi: 10.1007/s11250-017-1362-0. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
10
Mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in Botswana.博茨瓦纳资源匮乏的小农户进行靶向选择性驱虫治疗的混合方法评估
Vet Parasitol. 2015 Nov 30;214(1-2):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 9.