Shakiba Habibula, Dinesh Sethi, Anne Maree-Kelly
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD004173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004173.pub2.
Injury is responsible for an increasing global burden of death and disability. As a result, new models of trauma care have been developed. Many of these, though initially developed in high-income countries, are now being adopted in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). One such trauma care model is advanced trauma life support (ATLS) training in hospitals, which is being promoted in LMICs as a strategy for improving outcomes for victims of trauma. However, the evidence of effectiveness for this health service intervention, in either HIC or LMIC settings, has not been rigorously tested using methodology such as a systematic review.
To quantify the effectiveness of hospitals with an ATLS-trained trauma response system versus hospitals without such a response system in reducing mortality and morbidity following trauma.
We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register (CIGSR), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE & PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index, National Research Register, and web-based trials databases such as Current Controlled Trials. We checked references of background papers and contacted authors to identify additional published or unpublished data.
Randomised controlled trials, controlled trials, controlled before- and- after studies comparing effectiveness of hospitals with an ATLS-trained trauma response system versus hospitals without such a response system in reducing mortality and morbidity following trauma.
Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria to trial reports for inclusion and to extract data.
There is a limited literature relating to this topic but none of the studies identified met the inclusion criteria for this review.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear evidence that ATLS training (or similar) impacts on the outcome for victims of trauma, although there is some evidence that educational initiatives improve knowledge of what to do in emergency situations. Further, there is no evidence that trauma management systems incorporating ATLS training impact positively on outcome. Future research should concentrate on the evaluation of trauma systems incorporating ATLS, both within hospitals and at the health system level, by using rigorous research designs.
伤害导致全球范围内死亡和残疾负担不断加重。因此,新的创伤护理模式应运而生。其中许多模式虽然最初是在高收入国家开发的,但现在正被低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)采用。一种这样的创伤护理模式是医院中的高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)培训,它在LMICs中作为改善创伤受害者预后的一项策略而得到推广。然而,无论是在高收入国家还是在LMICs环境中,这种卫生服务干预措施有效性的证据尚未使用诸如系统评价等方法进行严格检验。
量化拥有经过ATLS培训的创伤应对系统的医院与没有此类应对系统的医院在降低创伤后死亡率和发病率方面的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane伤害组专业注册库(CIGSR)、Cochrane对照试验注册库(CCTR)、MEDLINE及PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、科学引文索引、国家研究注册库以及基于网络的试验数据库,如当前对照试验库。我们检查了背景论文的参考文献,并联系作者以识别其他已发表或未发表的数据。
比较拥有经过ATLS培训的创伤应对系统的医院与没有此类应对系统的医院在降低创伤后死亡率和发病率方面有效性的随机对照试验、对照试验、前后对照研究。
两名评价员独立应用纳入标准筛选试验报告以确定纳入研究并提取数据。
关于该主题的文献有限,但所识别的研究均未符合本综述的纳入标准。
没有明确证据表明ATLS培训(或类似培训)对创伤受害者的预后有影响,尽管有一些证据表明教育举措能提高对紧急情况下应对措施的认识。此外,没有证据表明纳入ATLS培训的创伤管理系统对预后有积极影响。未来的研究应集中于通过采用严谨的研究设计,在医院内部和卫生系统层面评估纳入ATLS的创伤系统。