Quigley C
Medical Oncology, Hammersmith Hospitals Trust, Du Cane Road, London, UK, W12 0NN.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD004847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004847.
Patients with cancer, and increasingly chronic non-cancer pain frequently require strong opioids for pain relief. Morphine is the first-line strong opioid of choice for these patients. While most achieve adequate analgesia with morphine, a significant minority either suffer intolerable side-effects, inadequate pain relief, or both. For these patients switching to an alternative opioid is becoming established clinical practice. However, the evidence for the effectiveness of opioid switching does not appear to be established.
The aim of this review was to investigate the usefulness of opioid switching for patients with pain.
Randomised trials that assessed opioid rotation, switching, or substitution in adults or children with acute or chronic pain were sought through electronic databases and by handsearching relevant journals. Date of the most recent search: January 2003.
The search strategy retrieved no randomised controlled trials, and therefore no studies were available to enable a quantitative synthesis that would assess the effectiveness of the strategy of opioid switching.
Given the lack of RCTs, the review examined all case reports, uncontrolled, and retrospective studies in an attempt to determine the current level of evidence.
Fifty-two reports were identified, comprising 23 case reports, 15 retrospective studies/audits and 14 prospective uncontrolled studies. The majority of the reports used morphine as first-line opioid and the most frequently used second-line opioid was methadone. All reports, apart from one, concluded that opioid switching is a useful clinical manoeuvre for improving pain control and/or reducing opioid-related side-effects.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: For patients with inadequate pain relief and intolerable opioid-related toxicity/adverse effects, a switch to an alternative opioid may be the only option for symptomatic relief. However, the evidence to support the practice of opioid switching is largely anecdotal or based on observational and uncontrolled studies. Randomised trials, including 'N of 1' studies, where a patient acts as their own control, are needed: firstly, to establish the true effectiveness of this clinical practice; secondly, to determine which opioid should be used first-line or second-line; and thirdly, to standardise conversion ratios when switching from one opioid to another.
癌症患者以及越来越多的慢性非癌性疼痛患者常常需要使用强效阿片类药物来缓解疼痛。吗啡是这些患者首选的一线强效阿片类药物。虽然大多数患者使用吗啡能获得足够的镇痛效果,但仍有相当一部分患者要么遭受难以忍受的副作用,要么疼痛缓解不充分,或者两者皆有。对于这些患者,改用另一种阿片类药物已成为既定的临床实践。然而,阿片类药物转换有效性的证据似乎尚未确立。
本综述的目的是研究阿片类药物转换对疼痛患者的有用性。
通过电子数据库和手工检索相关期刊,寻找评估成人或儿童急性或慢性疼痛中阿片类药物轮换、转换或替代的随机试验。最近一次检索日期:2003年1月。
检索策略未检索到随机对照试验,因此没有可用于进行定量综合分析以评估阿片类药物转换策略有效性的研究。
鉴于缺乏随机对照试验,本综述审查了所有病例报告、非对照研究和回顾性研究,以试图确定当前的证据水平。
共识别出52份报告,包括23份病例报告、15份回顾性研究/审计报告和14份前瞻性非对照研究报告。大多数报告将吗啡用作一线阿片类药物,最常用的二线阿片类药物是美沙酮。除一份报告外,所有报告均得出结论,阿片类药物转换是改善疼痛控制和/或减少阿片类药物相关副作用的有用临床策略。
对于疼痛缓解不充分且有难以忍受的阿片类药物相关毒性/不良反应的患者,改用另一种阿片类药物可能是缓解症状的唯一选择。然而,支持阿片类药物转换实践的证据很大程度上是轶事性的,或基于观察性和非对照研究。需要进行随机试验,包括“单病例”研究(患者自身作为对照):首先,确定这种临床实践的真正有效性;其次,确定哪种阿片类药物应作为一线或二线用药;第三,规范从一种阿片类药物转换为另一种阿片类药物时的转换比例。