Farnham Scott B, Cookson Michael S, Alberts Gregory, Smith Joseph A, Chang Sam S
Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Urol Oncol. 2004 May-Jun;22(3):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2003.12.005.
Although recent series have demonstrated that radical cystectomy can be safely performed in elderly patients, few if any, have examined the long-term success of this procedure. We sought to determine the long-term benefit and survival outcomes after radical cystectomy in the elderly, high operative risk patient. We reviewed the records of all patients undergoing radical cystectomy between July 1994 and January 2000. Of these 382 patients, we identified 38 patients with transitional cell carcinoma who met our predetermined selection criteria of elderly, high peri-operative risk patients [age > or = 75 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification > or = 3]. We analyzed patient characteristics, presenting symptoms, pathology, outcomes, and survival. Median age was 79 years (75-87 years). All but a single patient underwent surgery for symptomatic disease. No patient died in the early perioperative period. At a mean follow-up of 22 months (3-90 months), 11/38 (29%) patients are alive. Of the patients with < or = pT2B pathology, 9/27 (33%) are alive and are disease-free. There are 2/11 patients (18%) with > or = pT3 pathology still alive with 1 of those patients (pT4a) alive with disease 34 months after his radical cystectomy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrate that patients with organ confined disease (< or = pT2B) had a significantly longer mean overall survival than patients with nonorgan confined disease (> or = pT3): 31 months vs. 18 months, P = 0.046. Cause of death was known in 17 patients, with the majority (14/17) because of bladder cancer. However, there were no local recurrences, and palliative goals were achieved in all patients. Our results validate radical cystectomy as a safe and effective treatment choice in the elderly patient with significant co-morbidities. These patients, most of whom are symptomatic, can achieve palliation of their symptoms, local control, and long term survival, especially if their bladder cancer is organ confined. Reluctance to offer timely, aggressive local therapy may compromise ultimate survival, even amongst high operative risk, elderly patients.
尽管近期的系列研究表明根治性膀胱切除术可在老年患者中安全实施,但几乎没有研究探讨过该手术的长期成功率。我们试图确定老年、手术风险高的患者行根治性膀胱切除术后的长期获益和生存结果。我们回顾了1994年7月至2000年1月期间所有接受根治性膀胱切除术患者的记录。在这382例患者中,我们确定了38例符合我们预先设定的老年、围手术期高风险患者选择标准的移行细胞癌患者[年龄≥75岁且美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级≥3级]。我们分析了患者的特征、临床表现、病理、结局和生存情况。中位年龄为79岁(75 - 87岁)。除1例患者外,所有患者均因有症状的疾病接受手术。围手术期早期无患者死亡。平均随访22个月(3 - 90个月),38例患者中有11例(29%)存活。病理分期≤pT2B的患者中,27例中有9例(33%)存活且无疾病。病理分期≥pT3的11例患者中有2例(18%)仍存活,其中1例(pT4a)在根治性膀胱切除术后34个月仍存活且患有疾病。Kaplan - Meier生存曲线表明,器官局限性疾病(≤pT2B)患者的平均总生存期明显长于非器官局限性疾病(≥pT3)患者:31个月对18个月,P = 0.046。17例患者的死亡原因已知,大多数(14/17)是由于膀胱癌。然而,没有局部复发,所有患者均实现了姑息治疗目标。我们的结果证实了根治性膀胱切除术是患有严重合并症的老年患者安全有效的治疗选择。这些患者大多数有症状,能够实现症状缓解、局部控制和长期生存,特别是如果他们的膀胱癌是器官局限性的。即使在手术风险高的老年患者中,不愿及时提供积极的局部治疗也可能影响最终生存。