• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体间互动中的主导群体成员:人多是安全还是易受伤害?

Dominant group members in intergroup interaction: safety or vulnerability in numbers?

作者信息

Vorauer Jacquie D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Apr;29(4):498-511. doi: 10.1177/0146167202250917.

DOI:10.1177/0146167202250917
PMID:15273003
Abstract

An experiment examined how low- and high-prejudice dominant group members' (LPs' and HPs') reactions to intergroup contact were affected by whether they were accompanied by fellow ingroup members who exhibited prejudice-relevant behavior. Participants answered questions alone or in a group and then estimated how they were viewed by an observer who was an ingroup or an outgroup member. HPs believed that they were viewed more negatively by an outgroup member in the individual than the group condition. LPs showed the opposite effect, which led them to evaluate the outgroup member more negatively in the group condition. All participants in the group condition expected an outgroup member to exaggerate their similarity to the other ingroup members present, and LPs evaluated the other ingroup members more negatively when the observer was an outgroup member. The results suggest that intergroup attitudes guide the types of intergroup contact situations that are experienced most positively.

摘要

一项实验研究了低偏见和高偏见的主导群体成员(LP和HP)对群体间接触的反应,是否会受到其是否有表现出与偏见相关行为的同群体成员陪伴的影响。参与者独自或分组回答问题,然后估计作为同群体或外群体成员的观察者如何看待他们。HP认为,与分组情况相比,在外群体成员单独观察的情况下,他们会被负面评价更多。LP则表现出相反的效果,这导致他们在分组情况下对外群体成员的评价更负面。分组情况下的所有参与者都预计外群体成员会夸大他们与在场其他同群体成员的相似性,并且当观察者是外群体成员时,LP对其他同群体成员的评价更负面。结果表明,群体间态度指导着最能产生积极体验的群体间接触情境类型。

相似文献

1
Dominant group members in intergroup interaction: safety or vulnerability in numbers?群体间互动中的主导群体成员:人多是安全还是易受伤害?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Apr;29(4):498-511. doi: 10.1177/0146167202250917.
2
Miscommunications surrounding efforts to reach out across group boundaries.围绕跨越群体界限进行沟通所产生的误解。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Dec;31(12):1653-64. doi: 10.1177/0146167205277808.
3
I (dis)like the way you (dis)like them: The role of extended contact on social distance and attitudes towards the ingroup.我(不)喜欢你(不)喜欢他们的方式:扩展接触对社会距离和内群体态度的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;60(1):95-120. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12381. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.“我们”的另一面:当外群体成员表达共同身份时。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1613-26. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323600. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes.个体期望被地位较低群体的成员如何看待?元刻板印象的内容及影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Oct;75(4):917-37. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.917.
6
Intergroup Contact Effects via Ingroup Distancing among Majority and Minority Groups: Moderation by Social Dominance Orientation.多数群体和少数群体之间通过内群体疏远产生的群体间接触效应:社会支配取向的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146895. eCollection 2016.
7
Extended contact effects: is exposure to positive outgroup exemplars sufficient or is interaction with ingroup members necessary?延伸接触效应:接触积极的外群体榜样是否足够,还是与内群体成员互动是必要的?
J Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov-Dec;151(6):737-53. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2010.522622.
8
Intergroup boundaries and attitudes: the power of a single potent link.群体间界限和态度:单一强效联系的力量。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;39(7):943-55. doi: 10.1177/0146167213485444. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
9
Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid! Motivated Intergroup Emotion Regulation.害怕吧,害怕得要命!动机性群际情绪调节。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Nov;46(11):1596-1613. doi: 10.1177/0146167220910833. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Seeing eye-to-eye: do intergroup biases operate similarly for younger and older adults?意见一致:群体间偏见在年轻人和老年人中作用相似吗?
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2005;61(2):123-39. doi: 10.2190/07Q7-BWYT-NC9E-51FX.

引用本文的文献

1
Do dominant group members have different emotional responses to observing dominant-on-dominant versus dominant-on-disadvantaged ostracism? Some evidence for heightened reactivity to potentially discriminatory ingroup behavior.主导群体成员在观察到主导群体对主导群体与主导群体对弱势群体的排斥时,是否会有不同的情绪反应?一些证据表明,对潜在歧视性内群体行为的反应更为强烈。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0234540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234540. eCollection 2020.
2
An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.刻板印象威胁对表现影响的综合过程模型。
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):336-56. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.