Suppr超能文献

复发缓解型、继发进展型和原发进展型多发性硬化症认知障碍的差异。

Differences in cognitive impairment of relapsing remitting, secondary, and primary progressive MS.

作者信息

Huijbregts S C J, Kalkers N F, de Sonneville L M J, de Groot V, Reuling I E W, Polman C H

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neurology. 2004 Jul 27;63(2):335-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000129828.03714.90.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the cognitive skills of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and primary progressive MS (PPMS) relative to healthy control subjects and to assess whether there is heterogeneity in the type of cognitive disabilities demonstrated by patients with different MS phenotypes.

METHODS

RRMS patients (n = 108), SPMS patients (n = 71), PPMS patients (n = 55), and healthy control subjects (n = 67) underwent neuropsychological assessment with the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests.

RESULTS

Relative to controls, cognitive performance of RRMS patients was deficient when tasks required higher-order working memory (WM) processes (Word List Generation, 10/36 Spatial Recall Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test). PPMS and SPMS patients performed poorer than control subjects on all tasks. SPMS patients performed more poorly than PPMS patients when tasks required higher-order WM processes, except when speed of information processing played a relatively important role (Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test). Whereas RRMS patients generally performed better than the progressive subtypes, they showed relatively poor verbal fluency.

CONCLUSION

MS patients with different disease courses have different cognitive profiles.

摘要

目的

研究复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)、继发进展型多发性硬化症(SPMS)和原发进展型多发性硬化症(PPMS)患者相对于健康对照者的认知技能,并评估不同MS表型患者所表现出的认知障碍类型是否存在异质性。

方法

RRMS患者(n = 108)、SPMS患者(n = 71)、PPMS患者(n = 55)和健康对照者(n = 67)接受了简短可重复神经心理测试电池的神经心理评估。

结果

相对于对照组,当任务需要高阶工作记忆(WM)过程时(单词列表生成、10/36空间回忆测试、符号数字模态测试),RRMS患者的认知表现存在缺陷。PPMS和SPMS患者在所有任务上的表现均比对照者差。当任务需要高阶WM过程时,SPMS患者的表现比PPMS患者更差,但信息处理速度起相对重要作用时除外(符号数字模态测试、听觉连续加法测试)。虽然RRMS患者总体表现优于进展型亚型,但他们的言语流畅性相对较差。

结论

不同病程的MS患者具有不同的认知特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验