饮食失调检查问卷的时间稳定性。
Temporal stability of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire.
作者信息
Mond Jonathan M, Hay Phillipa J, Rodgers Bryan, Owen Cathy, Beumont Pierre J V
机构信息
Department of Psychological Medicine, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra ACT, Australia.
出版信息
Int J Eat Disord. 2004 Sep;36(2):195-203. doi: 10.1002/eat.20017.
OBJECTIVES
The current study examined the stability and internal consistency of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in a general population sample.
METHODS
The EDE-Q was administered to a community sample of women aged 18-45 on two occasions, with a median test-retest interval of 315.0 days.
RESULTS
Pearson correlations between items of the EDE-Q assessing attitudinal features of eating disorder psychopathology ranged from 0.57 for the Restraint subscale to 0.77 for the Eating Concern subscale. The stability of items addressing eating disorder behaviors was much lower, with phi coefficients for the occurrence of objective bulimic episodes, subjective bulimic episodes, and use of exercise as a compensatory behavior of 0.44, 0.24, and 0.31, respectively, and Kendall's tau b correlations of 0.44, 0.28, and 0.31, respectively, for the frequency of these behaviors, across occasions. The internal consistency of the EDE-Q was high, with a Cronbach alpha coefficient for the global scale of 0.93, compared with a value of 0.90 for the Eating Disorder Examination interview.
DISCUSSION
Items of the EDE-Q assessing attitudinal features of eating disorder psychopathology demonstrate a high degree of temporal stability, whereas the stability of items addressing eating disorder behaviors is much lower. In the case of compensatory eating disorder behaviors, low stability is likely to reflect actual trait variation, whereas the low stability of binge eating behaviors, in particular subjective bulimic episodes, is likely to reflect both trait variation and measurement error. The high internal consistency of EDE-Q items supports its use as a screening instrument in two-phase epidemiologic studies.
目的
本研究在一般人群样本中检验了饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)的稳定性和内部一致性。
方法
对18至45岁女性的社区样本进行了两次EDE-Q问卷调查,重测间隔中位数为315.0天。
结果
EDE-Q中评估饮食失调精神病理学态度特征的项目之间的Pearson相关性,从克制分量表的0.57到饮食关注分量表的0.77不等。涉及饮食失调行为项目的稳定性要低得多,客观贪食发作、主观贪食发作以及将运动作为补偿行为的出现情况的phi系数分别为0.44、0.24和0.31,这些行为频率在不同时间点的Kendall's tau b相关性分别为0.44、0.28和0.31。EDE-Q的内部一致性较高,整体量表的Cronbach alpha系数为0.93,而饮食失调检查访谈的该系数值为0.90。
讨论
EDE-Q中评估饮食失调精神病理学态度特征的项目表现出高度的时间稳定性,而涉及饮食失调行为项目的稳定性则低得多。对于补偿性饮食失调行为,低稳定性可能反映了实际的特质变化,而暴饮暴食行为(特别是主观贪食发作)的低稳定性可能反映了特质变化和测量误差。EDE-Q项目的高内部一致性支持其在两阶段流行病学研究中用作筛查工具。