Garner Alan A
NRMA CareFlight, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2004 Aug;16(4):318-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2004.00636.x.
The crewing of Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) for scene response to trauma patients is generally considered to be controversial, particularly regarding the role of physicians. This is reflected in HEMS in Australia with some services utilizing physician crewing for all prehospital missions. Others however, use physicians for selected missions only whilst others do not use physicians at all. This review seeks to determine whether the literature supports using physicians in addition to paramedics in HEMS teams for prehospital trauma care. Studies were excluded if they compared physician teams with basic life support teams (BLS) teams rather than paramedics. Ambulance officers were considered to be paramedics where they were able to administer intravenous fluids and use a method of airway management beyond bag-valve-mask ventilation. Studies were excluded if the skill set of the ambulance team was not defined, the level of staffing of the helicopter service was not stated, team composition varied without reporting outcomes for each team type, patient outcome data were not reported, or the majority of the transports were interhospital rather than prehospital transports.
直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)对创伤患者进行现场救援的人员配备通常被认为存在争议,尤其是关于医生的作用。这在澳大利亚的HEMS中有所体现,一些服务机构在所有院前任务中都配备医生。然而,其他机构仅在特定任务中使用医生,还有一些机构根本不使用医生。本综述旨在确定文献是否支持在HEMS团队中除护理人员外还使用医生进行院前创伤护理。如果研究比较的是医生团队与基础生命支持(BLS)团队而非护理人员,则将其排除。如果救护人员能够进行静脉输液并使用除袋阀面罩通气以外的气道管理方法,则将其视为护理人员。如果未定义救护团队的技能组合、未说明直升机服务的人员配备水平、团队组成不同但未报告每种团队类型的结果、未报告患者结局数据,或者大多数运输是医院间运输而非院前运输,则将研究排除。