Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus Hospital Nørrebrogade, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Mar 5;17:12. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-12.
The scientific evidence of a beneficial effect of physicians in prehospital treatment is scarce. The objective of this systematic review of controlled studies was to examine whether physicians, as opposed to paramedical personnel, increase patient survival in prehospital treatment and if so, to identify the patient groups that gain benefit.
A systematic review of studies published in the databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane from January 1, 1990 to November 24, 2008. Controlled studies comparing patient survival with prehospital physician treatment vs. treatment by paramedical personnel in trauma patients or patients with any acute illness were included.
We identified 1.359 studies of which 26 met our inclusion criteria. In nine of 19 studies including between 25 and 14.702 trauma patients in the intervention group, physician treatment increased survival compared to paramedical treatment. In four of five studies including between nine and 85 patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest, physician treatment increased survival. Only two studies including 211 and 2.869 patients examined unselected, broader patient groups. Overall, they demonstrated no survival difference between physician and paramedical treatment but one found increased survival with physician treatment in subgroups of patients with acute myocardial infarction and respiratory diseases.
Our systematic review revealed only few controlled studies of variable quality and strength examining survival with prehospital physician treatment. Increased survival with physician treatment was found in trauma and, based on more limited evidence, cardiac arrest. Indications of increased survival were found in respiratory diseases and acute myocardial infarction. Many conditions seen in the prehospital setting remain unexamined.
医生在院前治疗中有益效果的科学证据很少。本系统评价的目的是检验医生是否能提高院前治疗中患者的存活率,与辅助医疗人员相比,如果是,还要确定哪些患者群体受益。
对 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 11 月 24 日期间在数据库 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 上发表的研究进行系统回顾。纳入的研究是比较创伤患者或任何急性疾病患者的院前医生治疗与辅助医疗人员治疗的患者存活率的对照研究。
共检索到 1359 项研究,其中 26 项符合纳入标准。在 19 项研究中的 9 项研究中,干预组包括 25 至 14702 名创伤患者,医生治疗组的生存率高于辅助医疗人员治疗组。在包括 9 至 85 名院外心脏骤停患者的 5 项研究中的 4 项研究中,医生治疗提高了生存率。只有 2 项研究纳入了 211 名和 2869 名未选择的、更广泛的患者群体。总的来说,医生和辅助医疗人员治疗在生存率上没有差异,但其中一项研究发现,在急性心肌梗死和呼吸疾病亚组患者中,医生治疗的生存率增加。
我们的系统评价显示,只有少数质量和强度不同的对照研究检查了院前医生治疗的生存率。医生治疗在创伤中提高了生存率,基于更有限的证据,在心脏骤停中也提高了生存率。在呼吸疾病和急性心肌梗死中发现了生存率提高的迹象。在院前环境中看到的许多情况仍未得到检查。