Homack Susan, Riccio Cynthia A
Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, MS 4225, College Station, TX 77845-4225, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Sep;19(6):725-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2003.09.003.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which the Stroop Color-Word Test demonstrates sensitivity and specificity for the identification of executive function deficits in children and adolescents. Meta-analytic methods were used to identify executive function deficits associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other developmental disorders. Weighted effect sizes were calculated for all studies found that compared groups of children on the Stroop task. Results indicated that across studies, children and adolescents with ADHD fairly consistently exhibited poorer performance when compared to individuals without clinical diagnoses on the Stroop task as measured by the weighted Word, Color, Color-Word, and Interference scores. The Stroop task did not discriminate ADHD groups from other clinical groups consistently across studies. In conclusion, while impaired performance of the Stroop task may be indicative of an underlying neurological disorder related to frontal lobe dysfunction, poor performance is not sufficient for a diagnosis of ADHD.
本文旨在探讨斯特鲁普色词测验在识别儿童和青少年执行功能缺陷方面的敏感性和特异性程度。采用元分析方法来识别与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)及其他发育障碍相关的执行功能缺陷。对所有在斯特鲁普任务中比较儿童组的研究计算加权效应量。结果表明,在各项研究中,与无临床诊断的个体相比,患有ADHD的儿童和青少年在斯特鲁普任务中的表现相当一致地较差,这通过加权后的字词、颜色、色词和干扰分数来衡量。在各项研究中,斯特鲁普任务并不能始终如一地将ADHD组与其他临床组区分开来。总之,虽然斯特鲁普任务表现受损可能表明存在与额叶功能障碍相关的潜在神经障碍,但表现不佳并不足以诊断ADHD。