Suppr超能文献

罗马II标准在儿童排便障碍中的应用:在临床和研究实践中的适用性

Use of Rome II criteria in childhood defecation disorders: applicability in clinical and research practice.

作者信息

Voskuijl Wieger P, Heijmans Jarom, Heijmans Hugo S A, Taminiau Jan A J M, Benninga Marc A

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2004 Aug;145(2):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.04.050.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence of pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders with the use of the Rome II criteria and to compare these data with the classic Iowa criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients recorded defecation and encopresis frequency. A standard history was taken and a physical examination including a rectal examination was done. The prevalence of both criteria was assessed and compared.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-eight consecutive patients (age, 0.66 to 15.76 years; 131 male subjects) were included. According to the Rome II criteria, 64%, 18%, and 21% of patients fulfilled the criteria for functional constipation, functional fecal retention, and functional nonretentive fecal soiling, respectively. Using the classic criteria, 74% and 18% of patients fulfilled the criteria for pediatric constipation and solitary encopresis, respectively; 16% of the patients fulfilling the pediatric constipation criteria were not recognized by the Rome II constipation criteria. Fair agreement was found between functional nonretentive fecal soiling and solitary encopresis. Encopresis was present in 79% of constipated children.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rome criteria are restrictive and exclude several children with constipation. We recommend including encopresis and rectal digital examination and excluding arbitrary age limits and retentive behavior in the revision of the Rome criteria.

摘要

目的

采用罗马Ⅱ标准评估小儿功能性胃肠病的患病率,并将这些数据与经典的爱荷华标准进行比较。

研究设计

患者记录排便和大便失禁频率。进行标准病史采集并进行包括直肠检查在内的体格检查。评估并比较两种标准的患病率。

结果

纳入198例连续患者(年龄0.66至15.76岁;男性131例)。根据罗马Ⅱ标准,分别有64%、18%和21%的患者符合功能性便秘、功能性粪便潴留和功能性非潴留性大便失禁的标准。采用经典标准时,分别有74%和18%的患者符合小儿便秘和孤立性大便失禁的标准;符合小儿便秘标准的患者中有16%未被罗马Ⅱ便秘标准识别。功能性非潴留性大便失禁和孤立性大便失禁之间存在中等程度的一致性。79%的便秘儿童存在大便失禁。

结论

罗马标准具有局限性,排除了一些便秘儿童。我们建议在修订罗马标准时纳入大便失禁和直肠指检,并排除任意年龄限制和潴留行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验