Basketter David A, York Michael, McFadden John P, Robinson Michael K
Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever Colworth Laboratory, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, UK.
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Jul;51(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00385.x.
Recently adopted legislation in Europe has increased the focus that must be placed on the development of in vitro alternatives to the traditional toxicology tests employed to identify the human health hazards associated with chemicals. Included in these is the rabbit skin-irritation test which is used to discriminate those substances which possess significant acute skin irritation potential from those which are of more limited irritation potential. So far, the considerable efforts to replace this assay with in vitro alternatives have not been successful, which may in part be due to the relatively poor quality of the existing in vivo dataset. To help address this problem, we have elected to present our complete database of information on the skin irritation potential of some 65 substances, all of which have been tested in a standard human 4-h patch test. These provide a high quality dataset, generated in man (the goal of toxicologists' health protection-related activities). The data are presented in the context of results with a concurrent positive skin irritation control to ensure that results from individual experiments can be correlated. Consequently, in vitro or in silico alternatives which can identify the significant acute human skin irritants in this group may well represent suitable alternatives to the rabbit.
欧洲最近通过的立法进一步强调了,必须更加重视开发体外试验方法,以替代用于识别与化学品相关的人类健康危害的传统毒理学试验。其中包括兔皮肤刺激试验,该试验用于区分具有显著急性皮肤刺激潜力的物质和刺激潜力较有限的物质。到目前为止,用体外试验方法替代该试验的大量努力尚未成功,这可能部分是由于现有体内数据集的质量相对较差。为了帮助解决这个问题,我们选择展示我们关于约65种物质皮肤刺激潜力的完整信息数据库,所有这些物质都已在标准的人体4小时斑贴试验中进行了测试。这些数据提供了高质量的数据集,是在人体中生成的(这是毒理学家与健康保护相关活动的目标)。数据呈现时伴有阳性皮肤刺激对照的结果,以确保各个实验的结果具有相关性。因此,能够识别该组中显著急性人体皮肤刺激物的体外或计算机模拟替代方法很可能是兔试验的合适替代方法。