Suppr超能文献

用于分娩疼痛的补充和替代医学:一项系统评价

Complementary and alternative medicine for labor pain: a systematic review.

作者信息

Huntley Alyson L, Coon Joanna Thompson, Ernst Edzard

机构信息

Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature for, and critically appraise, randomized controlled trials of any type of complementary and alternative therapies for labor pain.

STUDY DESIGN

Six electronic databases were searched from their inception until July 2003. The inclusion criteria were that they were prospective, randomized controlled trials, involved healthy pregnant women at term, and contained outcome measures of labor pain.

RESULTS

Our search strategy found 18 trials. Six of these did not meet our inclusion criteria. The remaining 12 trials involved acupuncture (2), biofeedback (1), hypnosis (2), intracutaneous sterile water injections (4), massage (2), and respiratory autogenic training (1).

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence for the efficacy of any of the complementary and alternative therapies for labor pain, with the exception of intracutaneous sterile water injections. For all the other treatments described it is impossible to make any definitive conclusions regarding effectiveness in labor pain control.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统回顾各类用于缓解分娩疼痛的补充替代疗法的文献,并对其进行严格评估。

研究设计

检索了六个电子数据库,时间跨度从建库至2003年7月。纳入标准为前瞻性随机对照试验,涉及足月健康孕妇,并包含分娩疼痛的结局指标。

结果

我们的检索策略共找到18项试验。其中6项不符合纳入标准。其余12项试验涉及针灸(2项)、生物反馈(1项)、催眠(2项)、皮内注射无菌水(4项)、按摩(2项)和呼吸自生训练(1项)。

结论

除皮内注射无菌水外,尚无足够证据证明其他任何补充替代疗法对分娩疼痛有效。对于所描述的所有其他治疗方法,无法就其在控制分娩疼痛方面的有效性得出任何明确结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验