Giomarelli Pierpaolo, Biagioli Bonizella, Scolletta Sabino
Department of Surgery and Bioengineering, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Unit, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 1, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Sep;26(3):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.025.
A less-invasive method has been developed that may provide an alternative to monitor cardiac output from arterial pressure: beat-to-beat values of cardiac output can be obtained by pressure recording analytical method (PRAM). The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of cardiac output determination by PRAM in cardiac surgery.
Cardiac output was measured in 28 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at 15 min after anaesthesia induction, 30 min after extracorporeal circulation, 1 and 3 h after arrival in the intensive care unit using thermodilution (ThD) method through a pulmonary artery catheter and PRAM. ThD cardiac output was calculated as the mean of five separate measurements. PRAM provided beat-by-beat cardiac output data continuously throughout the study and the cardiac output values displayed on a dedicated personal computer at each time point were recorded. Correlations were calculated and differences were compared by Bland-Altman analysis.
A total of 112 measurements were obtained. Cardiac output ranged from 2.3 to 7.4 l/min, and a good linear correlation (R2=0.78, P<0.0001) was found between ThD and PRAM. The highest degree of correlation (R2=0.86) was obtained at 3 h after arrival in the intensive care unit. The lower degree of correlation (R2=0.70) was obtained 30 min after extracorporeal circulation. At Bland-Altman analysis, the overall estimates of cardiac output measured by PRAM closely agreed with ThD (mean difference, 0.027; standard deviation, 0.43; limits of agreement, -0.83 and +0.89).
Under the studied conditions, our results demonstrate good agreement between PRAM data and ThD measurements, and this new method has shown to be accurate for real-time monitoring of cardiac output in cardiac surgery. Further studies will be required to assess this method in higher-risk patients and in the setting of haemodynamic instability or arrhythmias. This is the first study designed to assess the accuracy of PRAM in cardiac surgery.
已开发出一种侵入性较小的方法,该方法可能为通过动脉压监测心输出量提供一种替代方案:通过压力记录分析法(PRAM)可获得逐搏心输出量值。本研究的目的是评估PRAM测定心输出量在心脏手术中的可靠性。
对28例行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者,在麻醉诱导后15分钟、体外循环后30分钟、入住重症监护病房1小时和3小时,使用肺动脉导管通过热稀释法(ThD)和PRAM测量心输出量。ThD心输出量计算为五次单独测量的平均值。PRAM在整个研究过程中持续提供逐搏心输出量数据,并记录每个时间点在专用个人计算机上显示的心输出量值。计算相关性,并通过Bland-Altman分析比较差异。
共获得112次测量值。心输出量范围为2.3至7.4升/分钟,ThD和PRAM之间发现良好的线性相关性(R2 = 0.78,P < 0.0001)。入住重症监护病房3小时时相关性最高(R2 = 0.86)。体外循环后30分钟时相关性较低(R2 = 0.70)。在Bland-Altman分析中,PRAM测量的心输出量总体估计值与ThD密切一致(平均差异为0.027;标准差为0.43;一致性界限为-0.83和+0.89)。
在研究条件下,我们的结果表明PRAM数据与ThD测量值之间具有良好的一致性,并且这种新方法已被证明可准确实时监测心脏手术中的心输出量。需要进一步研究以评估该方法在高危患者以及血流动力学不稳定或心律失常情况下的应用。这是第一项旨在评估PRAM在心脏手术中准确性的研究。