Blokland Arjan, Geraerts Elke, Been Marin
Faculty of Psychology, Brain and Behavior Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Behav Brain Res. 2004 Sep 23;154(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.01.022.
In the present study, we evaluated the search behavior of rats during a probe trial of a Morris water escape task. More specifically, the spatial memory during different stages of a 2 min probe trial in different zones was examined. After rats were trained for 4 days with four trials per day, their spatial memory was tested in a first probe trial. The rats showed a preference for the target quadrant during each of four 30-s intervals. The time in the annulus decreased across the four 30-s intervals. The preference for the previous target quadrant was also observed in a second probe trial, when the rats had received additional training for 4 days with four trials per day. However, the time spent in the annulus was highest during the first 30-s of the probe trial, and was lower and similar during the next three 30-s intervals. Therefore, probe trials of 60s seem to underestimate the spatial ability of rats. It appears that using a quadrant for assessing the performance may overestimate the spatial ability of a rat. Our findings suggest that the evaluation of the spatial memory of rats in a probe trial in the Morris water escape task requires a more detailed analysis.
在本研究中,我们评估了大鼠在莫里斯水迷宫逃避任务的探索试验中的搜索行为。更具体地说,研究了在2分钟探索试验的不同阶段,大鼠在不同区域的空间记忆情况。大鼠每天接受4次训练,共训练4天,之后在首次探索试验中测试其空间记忆。在四个30秒的时间段内,大鼠每次都表现出对目标象限的偏好。在这四个30秒的时间段内,大鼠在环带中停留的时间逐渐减少。在第二次探索试验中,当大鼠又接受了每天4次、为期4天的额外训练后,仍观察到其对先前目标象限的偏好。然而,在探索试验的前30秒内,大鼠在环带中停留的时间最长,在接下来的三个30秒时间段内停留时间较短且相近。因此,60秒的探索试验似乎低估了大鼠的空间能力。看来,使用象限来评估大鼠的表现可能高估了其空间能力。我们的研究结果表明,在莫里斯水迷宫逃避任务的探索试验中评估大鼠的空间记忆需要更详细的分析。