Dalen Lindy, Sonuga-Barke Edmund J S, Hall Martin, Remington Bob
Developmental Brain-Behaviour Unit, Department of Psychology University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, England.
Neural Plast. 2004;11(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1155/np.2004.1.
The dual pathway model proposes the existence of separate and neurobiologically distinct cognitive (inhibitory and more general executive dysfunction) and motivational (delay aversion) developmental routes to AD/HD. The study reported in this paper explores the relation between inhibitory deficits and delay aversion and their association with AD/HD in a group of three-year-old children. Children identified as having a pre-school equivalent of AD/HD (N=19) and controls (N=19), matched for gender and IQ, completed a battery of inhibition and delay tasks. Correlational and factor analysis supported a dissociation between inhibitory deficits (go-no-go, set shifting) and delay aversion (choice delay) with delay of gratification cross-loading. Children with AD/HD displayed more inhibitory deficits and were more delay averse than controls. The data support the value of the distinction between motivational and cognitive pathways to AD/HD. Furthermore, the data suggest that such a distinction is apparent relatively early on during development.
双通路模型提出,注意缺陷多动障碍(AD/HD)存在独立且在神经生物学上有区别的认知(抑制及更普遍的执行功能障碍)和动机(延迟厌恶)发展路径。本文所报告的研究探讨了一组三岁儿童的抑制缺陷与延迟厌恶之间的关系,以及它们与AD/HD的关联。被确定为患有相当于学前AD/HD的儿童(N = 19)和对照组(N = 19),在性别和智商上进行了匹配,完成了一系列抑制和延迟任务。相关分析和因素分析支持了抑制缺陷(停止信号任务、定势转换)与延迟厌恶(选择延迟)之间的分离,延迟满足存在交叉负荷。与对照组相比,患有AD/HD的儿童表现出更多的抑制缺陷,且更厌恶延迟。这些数据支持了区分AD/HD的动机和认知路径的价值。此外,数据表明这种区分在发育过程中相对较早地就很明显。