• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

等待奖励对你有好处吗?在一个大型队列样本中,冲动选择、精神病理学与功能结果之间没有关联。

Is waiting for rewards good for you? No association between impulsive choice, psychopathology, and functional outcomes in a large cohort sample.

作者信息

Bado Patricia P, Salum Giovanni A, Rohde Luis A, Gadelha Ary, Pan Pedro M, Miguel Eurípedes C, Tripp Gail, Furukawa Emi

机构信息

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (UFRGS) Porto Alegre Brazil.

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) Rio de Janeiro Brazil.

出版信息

JCPP Adv. 2024 Apr 15;4(2):e12231. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12231. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12231
PMID:38827985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11143955/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A stronger preference for immediate rewards has been reported in individuals with ADHD and other disorders. However, the consistency of the associations between this preference and psychiatric conditions as well as functional outcomes have been questioned. Research on its association with longitudinal outcomes is scarce.

METHODS

The current study used data on a choice delay task (CDT) from a school-based cohort of Brazilian children with those at higher risk for psychiatric disorders over-sampled ( = 1917). The sample included typically developing children ( = 1379), those with ADHD ( = 213), and other disorders. The frequency of the trials where children chose a larger later reward versus a smaller sooner reward was compared for those with ADHD and typically developing children. Cross-sectionally and longitudinally, the study also evaluated whether children's preference for larger delayed rewards at baseline predicted the presence of psychiatric disorders and functional life outcomes (academic performance, alcohol use, early pregnancy, criminal conviction, BMI).

RESULTS

Children with ADHD and their typically developing peers performed similarly on the CDT. Their baseline task performance was not related to psychiatric conditions or life outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results raise questions regarding the use of the CDT with diverse populations and whether a preference for larger delayed rewards is predictive of positive long-term outcomes as widely assumed.

摘要

背景

据报道,患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和其他疾病的个体对即时奖励有更强的偏好。然而,这种偏好与精神疾病以及功能结局之间关联的一致性受到了质疑。关于其与纵向结局关联的研究很少。

方法

本研究使用了来自巴西儿童学校队列的选择延迟任务(CDT)数据,对有更高精神疾病风险的儿童进行了过度抽样(n = 1917)。样本包括发育正常的儿童(n = 1379)、患有ADHD的儿童(n = 213)和其他疾病儿童。比较了患有ADHD的儿童和发育正常儿童选择更大的延迟奖励而非更小的即时奖励的试验频率。在横断面和纵向研究中,该研究还评估了儿童在基线时对更大延迟奖励的偏好是否能预测精神疾病的存在和功能生活结局(学业成绩、饮酒、早孕、刑事定罪、体重指数)。

结果

患有ADHD的儿童及其发育正常的同龄人在CDT上表现相似。他们的基线任务表现与精神疾病或生活结局无关。

结论

目前的结果对在不同人群中使用CDT以及更大延迟奖励的偏好是否如广泛假设的那样能预测积极的长期结局提出了疑问。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a9/11143955/845c2c942208/JCV2-4-e12231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a9/11143955/845c2c942208/JCV2-4-e12231-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48a9/11143955/845c2c942208/JCV2-4-e12231-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Is waiting for rewards good for you? No association between impulsive choice, psychopathology, and functional outcomes in a large cohort sample.等待奖励对你有好处吗?在一个大型队列样本中,冲动选择、精神病理学与功能结果之间没有关联。
JCPP Adv. 2024 Apr 15;4(2):e12231. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12231. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Preference for Smaller Sooner Over Larger Later Rewards in ADHD: Contribution of Delay Duration and Paradigm Type.ADHD 患者更倾向于选择较小的即时奖励而非较大的延迟奖励:延迟时间和范式类型的影响。
J Atten Disord. 2018 Aug;22(10):984-993. doi: 10.1177/1087054715570390. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
3
ADHD and delay aversion: the influence of non-temporal stimulation on choice for delayed rewards.注意力缺陷多动障碍与延迟厌恶:非时间性刺激对延迟奖励选择的影响。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;47(11):1152-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01619.x.
4
Disrupted waiting behavior in ADHD: exploring the impact of reward availability and predictive cues.ADHD 中的等待行为紊乱:探究奖励可得性和预测线索的影响。
Child Neuropsychol. 2023 Jan;29(1):76-95. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2068518. Epub 2022 May 9.
5
Waiting and working for rewards: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder is associated with steeper delay discounting linked to amygdala activation, but not with steeper effort discounting.等待和工作以获得奖励:注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与杏仁核激活相关的延迟折扣率增加有关,而与努力折扣率增加无关。
Cortex. 2018 Sep;106:164-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
6
Planning to make economic decisions in the future, but choosing impulsively now: are preference reversals related to symptoms of ADHD and depression?计划未来做出经济决策,但现在却冲动行事:偏好逆转与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和抑郁症的症状有关吗?
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Sep;25(3):178-89. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1511. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Waiting by mistake: symbolic representation of rewards modulates intertemporal choice in capuchin monkeys, preschool children and adult humans.错误等待:奖励的符号表征调节卷尾猴、学龄前儿童和成年人的跨期选择。
Cognition. 2014 Mar;130(3):428-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
8
Temporal and probabilistic discounting of rewards in children and adolescents: effects of age and ADHD symptoms.儿童和青少年对奖励的时间和概率折扣:年龄及注意缺陷多动障碍症状的影响
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2092-103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.012. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
9
Environmental Stimulation Does Not Reduce Impulsive Choice in ADHD: A "Pink Noise" Study.环境刺激并不能减少注意缺陷多动障碍中的冲动选择:一项“粉红噪声”研究。
J Atten Disord. 2016 Jan;20(1):63-70. doi: 10.1177/1087054713479667. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
10
Developmental deviation in delay discounting as a transdiagnostic indicator of risk for child psychopathology.发展性延迟折扣偏差作为儿童心理病理学风险的跨诊断指标。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;65(2):148-164. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13870. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Developmental deviation in delay discounting as a transdiagnostic indicator of risk for child psychopathology.发展性延迟折扣偏差作为儿童心理病理学风险的跨诊断指标。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;65(2):148-164. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13870. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Developmental trajectories of delay discounting from childhood to young adulthood: longitudinal associations and test-retest reliability.从儿童期到成年早期的延迟折扣发展轨迹:纵向关联和重测信度。
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Dec;139:101518. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101518. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
3
Sooner is Better: Longitudinal Relations Between Delay Discounting, and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms among Vietnamese Adolescents.
越快越好:越南青少年延迟折扣与抑郁和焦虑症状的纵向关系。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023 Jan;51(1):133-147. doi: 10.1007/s10802-022-00959-5. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
4
The globalizability of temporal discounting.时间贴现的全球化。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Oct;6(10):1386-1397. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01392-w. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
5
Disrupted waiting behavior in ADHD: exploring the impact of reward availability and predictive cues.ADHD 中的等待行为紊乱:探究奖励可得性和预测线索的影响。
Child Neuropsychol. 2023 Jan;29(1):76-95. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2068518. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of delay discounting and cannabis use.一项关于延迟折扣和大麻使用的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Dec;29(6):696-710. doi: 10.1037/pha0000378. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Inequality in personality and temporal discounting across socioeconomic status? Assessing the evidence.社会经济地位在人格和时间贴现方面的不平等?评估相关证据。
J Res Pers. 2019 Aug;81:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 18.
8
Same Data Set, Different Conclusions: Preschool Delay of Gratification Predicts Later Behavioral Outcomes in a Preregistered Study.同一数据集,不同结论:在一项预先注册的研究中,学前延迟满足预测了后续的行为结果。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Feb;31(2):193-201. doi: 10.1177/0956797619896270. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
9
Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysis.延迟折扣作为精神障碍共病过程的研究:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 1;76(11):1176-1186. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2102.
10
The cumulative effect of reporting and citation biases on the apparent efficacy of treatments: the case of depression.报告和引用偏倚对治疗表观疗效的累积影响:以抑郁症为例。
Psychol Med. 2018 Nov;48(15):2453-2455. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001873. Epub 2018 Aug 2.