Suppr超能文献

颈部无临床阳性发现的声门上型喉癌的颈清扫术(N0)

[Jugular neck dissection for supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma with negative clinical findings in the neck (N0)].

作者信息

Petrović Zeljko, Jelić Svetislav, Pendjer Ivica

出版信息

Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2004 Mar-Apr;132(3-4):73-5. doi: 10.2298/sarh0404073p.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Appropriate management of patients with supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma and negative findings in the neck is still controversial. A prospective and retrospective study comprised 193 patients who were treated primary surgically between 1976 and 1993. They all had clinically and ultrasound negative findings on the neck (N0). Supraglottic carcinomas usually spread regionally. Metastases develop in the jugular group, between level II-IV. The incidence of metastases has been reported to vary from 12 to 62.5%. The size and localization of the primary tumor, its histological grade, genotype of the malignant cells, immunological and other elucidated factors can all affect the incidence of regional spread.

AIM

Aim of this study was to specify the incidence of occult cervical metastases; to analyze the distribution of occult metastases related to tumor localization; to specify the distribution of occult metastases related to local spread; to analyze the distribution of occult metastases according to localization in the neck.

RESULTS

All patients had primary surgery of primary tumor and bilateral jugular, selective neck dissection at the level II-IV with histological examination of removed lymphoid tissue. Out of 193 patients, metastatic deposits were detected in 35 (18%). Occult metastases were found in patients with carcinoma of the epilarynx in 19% (14/72) of cases, and in 17% (21/121) patients with carcinoma of the supraglottis excluding the epilarynx. This difference in frequency is not statistically significant. The incidence of occult metastases in epilaryngeal tumors did not depend on the degree of local spread. Even relatively small tumors (T1 and T2) yielded occult metastases in 33% (5/15), and 24% (6/25) of patients, respectively. In patients with T1 tumors localized at the supraglottis, excluding the epilarynx, occult metastases were not found. In the supraglottis excluding the epilarynx increased local spread was associated an increase of occult metastases. The incidence of occult metastases was directly related to the degree of the local spread of the tumor in the supraglottis excluding the epilarynx (Table 1). Occult metastases were usually ipsilateral, like the palpable ones. In medially localized tumors bilateral metastases were possible. Ipsilateral metastases were more frequent than both bilateral and contralateral ones. The possibility of contralateral and bilateral occult metastases necessitated bilateral neck dissection. Postoperative radiotherapy (60 Gy) was given to all patients with verified occult metastases. Only in two patients (1%) of the total did metastases develop subsequently, indicating the effectiveness of planned postoperative radiotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Controversies in application of jugular, selective neck dissection are present since it has been in use, because of the unclear role which regional lymph tissue play in antitumor immune response. Jugular, selective neck dissection was advocated in all patients with a primary supraglottic laryngeal carcinomas. It was suggested that selective neck dissection was needed only in advanced (T3 and T4) tumors. Selective dissection is believed to be needed only when tumor has spread into the vallecula, the base of the tongue, or the medial wall of the piriform sinus. The idea of selective neck dissection has been opposed since the protective role of the cervical lymph tissue has been stressed. Ultrasound and computerized tomography of the neck cannot detect occult metastases. Today, only removal and histological examination of the lymph tissue can determine occult metastasis. The importance of selective neck dissection is considered in diagnostic biopsy procedure by which occult metastatic spread in the neck region is established.

CONCLUSION

Due to the tendency of supraglottic carcinoma resulting in occult cervical metastases, early detection is imperative in order to apply the appropriate therapy. Occult cervical metastases are usually ipsilateral, but bilateral and contralateral may be found as well. Due to the aforementioned, it is necessary to perform bilateral jugular, selective cervical dissection of the neck level II-IV with histological evidence of removed lymph tissue. When metastases is verified histologically, postoperative radiotherapy is indicated as being efficient in hampering the development of palpable metastases. Five-year survival with no evidence disease is 86% (166/193).

摘要

引言

声门上型喉癌患者颈部检查结果为阴性时的恰当治疗仍存在争议。一项前瞻性和回顾性研究纳入了1976年至1993年间接受初次手术治疗的193例患者。他们颈部的临床检查和超声检查结果均为阴性(N0)。声门上型癌通常区域扩散。转移灶出现在颈静脉组,位于II - IV区。据报道,转移发生率在12%至62.5%之间。原发肿瘤的大小和位置、组织学分级、恶性细胞的基因型、免疫学及其他已阐明的因素均会影响区域扩散的发生率。

目的

本研究的目的是明确隐匿性颈部转移的发生率;分析隐匿性转移与肿瘤位置相关的分布情况;明确隐匿性转移与局部扩散相关的分布情况;根据颈部位置分析隐匿性转移的分布情况。

结果

所有患者均接受了原发肿瘤的初次手术以及双侧颈静脉、II - IV区选择性颈部清扫,并对切除的淋巴组织进行了组织学检查。193例患者中,35例(18%)检测到转移灶。会厌癌患者中隐匿性转移的发生率为19%(14/72),声门上区(不包括会厌)癌患者中为17%(21/121)。这种频率差异无统计学意义。会厌部肿瘤隐匿性转移的发生率不取决于局部扩散程度。即使相对较小的肿瘤(T1和T2),隐匿性转移的发生率分别为33%(5/15)和24%(6/25)。在声门上区(不包括会厌)的T1肿瘤患者中未发现隐匿性转移。在声门上区(不包括会厌),局部扩散增加与隐匿性转移增加相关。隐匿性转移的发生率与声门上区(不包括会厌)肿瘤局部扩散程度直接相关(表1)。隐匿性转移通常与可触及的转移一样为同侧性。对于内侧定位的肿瘤,双侧转移是可能的。同侧转移比双侧和对侧转移更常见。对侧和双侧隐匿性转移的可能性使得有必要进行双侧颈部清扫。所有经证实有隐匿性转移的患者均接受了术后放疗(60 Gy)。在全部患者中仅有2例(1%)随后出现转移,表明计划的术后放疗有效。

讨论

自颈静脉选择性颈部清扫术应用以来就存在争议,因为区域淋巴组织在抗肿瘤免疫反应中的作用尚不清楚。对于所有原发性声门上型喉癌患者均主张进行颈静脉选择性颈部清扫。有人认为仅在晚期(T3和T4)肿瘤患者中需要进行选择性颈部清扫。有人认为仅当肿瘤扩散至会厌谷、舌根或梨状窦内侧壁时才需要进行选择性清扫。自从强调颈部淋巴组织的保护作用以来,选择性颈部清扫的观点就受到反对。颈部超声和计算机断层扫描无法检测到隐匿性转移。如今,只有切除淋巴组织并进行组织学检查才能确定隐匿性转移。在诊断性活检程序中考虑了选择性颈部清扫的重要性,通过该程序可确定颈部区域隐匿性转移扩散情况。

结论

由于声门上型癌有导致隐匿性颈部转移的倾向,为了应用恰当的治疗,早期检测至关重要。隐匿性颈部转移通常为同侧性,但也可能发现双侧和对侧转移。基于上述情况,有必要进行双侧颈静脉、II - IV区选择性颈部清扫,并对切除的淋巴组织进行组织学检查。当组织学证实有转移时,术后放疗被认为可有效阻碍可触及转移的发生。无疾病证据的五年生存率为86%(166/193)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验