Lacourcière Yves, Neutel Joel M, Davidai Gloria, Koval Steve
Hypertension Research Unit, CHUL, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, 2705 boulevard Laurier S-135, Sainte Foy, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2, Canada.
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Jan;19(1):104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.001.
Blood pressure (BP) has a circadian pattern with a morning surge that is associated with an increased risk of acute coronary and cerebrovascular events. In a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, multicenter, forced-titration study of telmisartan and ramipril, the efficacy of both drugs on mean ambulatory diastolic BP (DBP) and systolic BP (SBP) during the last 6 h of a 24-h dosing interval was evaluated.
After screening and a single-blind run-in phase, 812 adults with mild-to-moderate hypertension (defined as a mean seated DBP > or =95 mm Hg and < or =109 mm Hg and a 24-h ABPM mean DBP 7 > or = 85 mm Hg) were randomized to the open-label, 14-week, forced-titration, active-treatment phase as follows: telmisartan 40 mg/80 mg/80 mg (n = 405) or ramipril 2.5 mg/5 mg/10 mg (n = 407), once daily in the morning. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in the last 6-h mean DBP and SBP at 8 and 14 weeks as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Secondary efficacy variables were changes from baseline in BP control during each of the 24-h periods and in-clinic trough cuff BP.
Telmisartan 80 mg was superior to ramipril 5 mg and 10 mg in change from baseline in the last 6-h ABPM mean DBP and SBP at both 8 and 14 weeks (both P < .0001), respectively. At 14 weeks, the adjusted mean change from baseline in DBP for telmisartan 80 mg was -8.8 mm Hg compared with that for ramipril 10 mg of -5.4 mm Hg (P < .0001). For SBP, the adjusted mean change from baseline for telmisartan 80 mg was -12.7 mm Hg compared with that for ramipril 10 mg of -7.9 mm Hg (P < .0001). At 14 weeks, telmisartan 80 mg also yielded superior reductions from baseline in trough cuff BP compared with ramipril 10 mg (DBP: -11.0 mm Hg v -7.8 mm Hg, respectively; SBP: -14.3 mm Hg v -9.1 mm Hg, respectively; both P < .0001). Measures of 24-h BP control favored telmisartan 80 mg versus ramipril 10 mg (P < .0001), as did other secondary ABPM endpoints during the daytime, night-time, and morning periods. Treatment-related adverse events were uncommon; patients treated with ramipril had a higher incidence of cough than those treated with telmisartan (10.1% v 1.5%, respectively).
Telmisartan 80 mg was consistently more effective than ramipril 10 mg in reducing both DBP and SBP during the last 6 h of the dosing interval, a measure of the early morning period when patients are at greatest risk of life-threatening cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Telmisartan 80 mg was also more effective than ramipril 10 mg in reducing BP throughout the entire 24-h dosing interval. Both drugs were well tolerated.
血压具有昼夜节律模式,早晨血压会出现高峰,这与急性冠状动脉和脑血管事件风险增加相关。在一项关于替米沙坦和雷米普利的前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点、平行组、多中心、强制滴定研究中,评估了两种药物在24小时给药间隔的最后6小时对动态平均舒张压(DBP)和收缩压(SBP)的疗效。
经过筛选和单盲导入期后,812例轻度至中度高血压成人(定义为坐位平均DBP≥95mmHg且≤109mmHg,24小时动态血压监测平均DBP≥85mmHg)被随机分为开放标签、为期14周的强制滴定、积极治疗阶段,如下:替米沙坦40mg/80mg/80mg(n = 405)或雷米普利2.5mg/5mg/10mg(n = 407),每天早晨服用一次。主要疗效变量是通过动态血压监测(ABPM)评估的第8周和第14周最后6小时平均DBP和SBP相对于基线的变化。次要疗效变量是24小时各时段血压控制相对于基线的变化以及诊室谷值袖带血压。
在第8周和第14周时,替米沙坦80mg在最后6小时ABPM平均DBP和SBP相对于基线的变化方面均优于雷米普利5mg和10mg(均P <.0001)。在第14周时,替米沙坦80mg相对于基线的DBP调整后平均变化为-8.8mmHg,而雷米普利10mg为-5.4mmHg(P <.0001)。对于SBP,替米沙坦80mg相对于基线的调整后平均变化为-12.7mmHg,而雷米普利10mg为-7.9mmHg(P <.0001)。在第14周时,替米沙坦80mg在谷值袖带血压相对于基线的降低方面也优于雷米普利10mg(DBP分别为-11.0mmHg对-7.8mmHg;SBP分别为-14.3mmHg对-9.1mmHg;均P <.0001)。24小时血压控制指标显示替米沙坦80mg优于雷米普利10mg(P <.0001),白天、夜间和早晨时段的其他次要ABPM终点指标也是如此。治疗相关不良事件不常见;接受雷米普利治疗的患者咳嗽发生率高于接受替米沙坦治疗的患者(分别为10.1%对1.5%)。
在给药间隔的最后6小时,即患者发生危及生命的心血管和脑血管事件风险最高的清晨时段,替米沙坦80mg在降低DBP和SBP方面始终比雷米普利10mg更有效。在整个24小时给药间隔内,替米沙坦80mg在降低血压方面也比雷米普利10mg更有效。两种药物耐受性均良好。