Reiner Anton, Perkel David J, Mello Claudio V, Jarvis Erich D
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1016:77-108. doi: 10.1196/annals.1298.013.
It has become increasingly clear that the standard nomenclature for many telencephalic and related brainstem structures of the avian brain is based on flawed once-held assumptions of homology to mammalian brain structures, greatly hindering functional comparisons between avian and mammalian brains. This has become especially problematic for those researchers studying the neurobiology of birdsong, the largest single group within the avian neuroscience community. To deal with the many communication problems this has caused among researchers specializing in different vertebrate classes, the Avian Brain Nomenclature Forum, held at Duke University from July 18-20, 2002, set out to develop a new terminology for the avian telencephalon and some allied brainstem cell groups. In one major step, the erroneous conception that the avian telencephalon consists mainly of a hypertrophied basal ganglia has been purged from the telencephalic terminology, and the actual parts of the basal ganglia and its brainstem afferent cell groups have been given new names to reflect their now-evident homologies. The telencephalic regions that were incorrectly named to reflect presumed homology to mammalian basal ganglia have been renamed as parts of the pallium. The prefixes used for the new names for the pallial subdivisions have retained most established abbreviations, in an effort to maintain continuity with the pre-existing nomenclature. Here we present a brief synopsis of the inaccuracies in the old nomenclature, a summary of the nomenclature changes, and details of changes for specific songbird vocal and auditory nuclei. We believe this new terminology will promote more accurate understanding of the broader neurobiological implications of song control mechanisms and facilitate the productive exchange of information between researchers studying avian and mammalian systems.
越来越明显的是,鸟类大脑许多端脑及相关脑干结构的标准命名法是基于曾经与哺乳动物脑结构同源性的错误假设,这极大地阻碍了鸟类和哺乳动物大脑之间的功能比较。对于研究鸟鸣神经生物学的研究人员来说,这一问题尤为突出,他们是鸟类神经科学界最大的单一群体。为了解决这一问题给专门研究不同脊椎动物类群的研究人员之间造成的诸多沟通障碍,2002年7月18日至20日在杜克大学举行的鸟类大脑命名法论坛着手为鸟类端脑和一些相关脑干细胞群制定新的术语。在一个重要步骤中,鸟类端脑主要由肥大的基底神经节组成这一错误概念已从端脑术语中清除,基底神经节及其脑干传入细胞群的实际部分已被赋予新名称以反映它们现在明显的同源性。那些为反映与哺乳动物基底神经节假定同源性而被错误命名的端脑区域已被重新命名为大脑皮层的一部分。大脑皮层细分新名称使用的前缀保留了大多数已确立的缩写,以便与先前的命名法保持连续性。在此,我们简要概述旧命名法中的不准确之处、命名法变化的总结以及特定鸣禽发声和听觉核团变化的细节。我们相信,这一新术语将促进对鸣叫控制机制更广泛神经生物学意义的更准确理解,并促进研究鸟类和哺乳动物系统的研究人员之间富有成效的信息交流。