Fox Keith A A, Mehta Shamir R, Peters Ron, Zhao Feng, Lakkis Nasser, Gersh Bernard J, Yusuf Salim
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Circulation. 2004 Sep 7;110(10):1202-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140675.85342.1B. Epub 2004 Aug 16.
Antiplatelet therapy and antithrombin therapy have been demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiac events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, yet all effective therapies also increase the risk of bleeding.
In the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) trial, 12 562 patients were randomized to clopidogrel or placebo in addition to aspirin, and the primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. The benefits were consistent among those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [9.6% for clopidogrel, 13.2% for placebo; relative risk (RR), 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.90], coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery (14.5% for clopidogrel 16.2% for placebo; RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.11), and medical therapy only (8.1% for clopidogrel, 10.0% for placebo; RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.92; test for interaction among strata, 0.53). For CABG during the initial hospitalization (530 for placebo, 485 for clopidogrel), the frequency of CV death, MI or stroke before CABG was 4.7% for placebo and 2.9% for clopidogrel (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.08). For the entire study, there was a 1% excess of major bleeding but no significant excess of life-threatening bleeding. Among patients undergoing CABG, the rates of life-threatening bleeding were 5.6% for clopidogrel and 4.2% for placebo (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.95; both nonsignificant).
The benefits versus risks of early and long-term clopidogrel therapy (freedom from CV death, MI, stroke, or life-threatening bleeding) are similar in those undergoing revascularization (CABG or PCI) and in the study population as a whole. Overall, the benefits of starting clopidogrel on admission appear to outweigh the risks, even among those who proceed to CABG during the initial hospitalization.
抗血小板治疗和抗凝血酶治疗已被证明可降低急性冠状动脉综合征患者发生心脏事件的风险,但所有有效治疗也会增加出血风险。
在“氯吡格雷用于不稳定型心绞痛预防复发性缺血事件(CURE)”试验中,12562例患者除服用阿司匹林外,被随机分为氯吡格雷组或安慰剂组,主要结局为心血管(CV)死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或中风。在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中(氯吡格雷组为9.6%,安慰剂组为13.2%;相对风险[RR],0.72;95%CI,0.57至0.90)、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术的患者中(氯吡格雷组为14.5%,安慰剂组为16.2%;RR,0.89;95%CI,0.71至1.11)以及仅接受药物治疗的患者中(氯吡格雷组为8.1%,安慰剂组为10.0%;RR,0.80;95%CI,0.69至0.92;各层间交互作用检验,0.53),获益情况一致。对于初次住院期间进行CABG的患者(安慰剂组530例,氯吡格雷组485例),CABG前CV死亡、MI或中风的发生率,安慰剂组为4.7%,氯吡格雷组为2.9%(RR,0.56;95%CI,0.29至1.08)。在整个研究中,严重出血有1%的超额发生率,但危及生命的出血无显著超额发生率。在接受CABG的患者中,危及生命出血的发生率,氯吡格雷组为5.6%,安慰剂组为4.2%(RR,1.30;95%CI,0.91至1.95;均无统计学意义)。
在接受血运重建(CABG或PCI)的患者以及整个研究人群中,早期和长期氯吡格雷治疗的获益与风险(免于CV死亡、MI、中风或危及生命的出血)相似。总体而言,入院时开始使用氯吡格雷的获益似乎超过风险,即使在初次住院期间进行CABG的患者中也是如此。