Suppr超能文献

客观结构化临床考试的标准设定:临界方法试验

Standard setting for OSCEs: trial of borderline approach.

作者信息

Kilminster Sue, Roberts Trudie

机构信息

Medical Education Unit, Level 7 Worsley Building, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9(3):201-9. doi: 10.1023/B:AHSE.0000038208.06099.9a.

Abstract

OSCE examinations were held in May and June 2002 for all third and fourth year and some fifth year medical students at the University of Leeds. There has been an arbitrary pass mark of 65% for these examinations. However, we recognise that it is important to adopt a systematic approach towards standard setting in all examinations so held a trial of the borderline approach to standard setting for third and fifth year examinations. This paper reports our findings. The results for the year 3 OSCE demonstrated that the borderline approach to standard setting is feasible and offers a method to ensure that the pass standard is both justifiable and credible. It is efficient, requiring much less time than other methods and has the advantage of using the judgements of expert clinicians about actual practice. In addition it offers a way of empowering clinicians because it uses their expertise.

摘要

2002年5月和6月,利兹大学对所有三年级、四年级以及部分五年级的医学生进行了客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)。这些考试设定了65%的任意及格分数。然而,我们认识到在所有此类考试中采用系统的标准设定方法很重要,因此对三年级和五年级考试的临界值标准设定方法进行了试验。本文报告了我们的研究结果。三年级客观结构化临床考试的结果表明,临界值标准设定方法是可行的,并且提供了一种确保及格标准合理且可信的方法。它效率高,比其他方法所需时间少得多,并且具有利用临床专家对实际操作的判断这一优势。此外,它还提供了一种赋予临床医生权力的方式,因为它利用了他们的专业知识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验