Conley Barbara A, Taube Sheila E
Medical Oncology Clinical Research Unit, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Dis Markers. 2004;20(2):35-43. doi: 10.1155/2004/202031.
The elucidation of the human genome and advances in knowledge about molecular abnormalities, signaling pathways, influence of the local tissue milieu and the relevance of genetic polymorphisms offer hope of designing more effective, individualized cancer treatment plans. Although the scientific and medical literature is replete with reports of putative prognostic or predictive markers for cancer, few new diagnostics have been incorporated into routine clinical practice. Criteria are needed to a) identify markers that have the promise to be clinically useful; b) assess the best methodology for clinical evaluation of the markers in question and c) confirm or validate that using the marker adds useful information compared to using standard prognostic factors alone. This review presents a methodology for the clinical evaluation of putative prognostic and predictive markers in cancer, with considerations of pitfalls in the early evaluation, rationale for development and optimization of assay methodology, and examples of possible clinical trials for assessing the clinical utility of putative markers.
人类基因组的阐明以及在分子异常、信号通路、局部组织环境的影响和基因多态性相关性等方面知识的进展,为设计更有效、个性化的癌症治疗方案带来了希望。尽管科学和医学文献中充斥着关于癌症假定预后或预测标志物的报道,但很少有新的诊断方法被纳入常规临床实践。需要有标准来:a)识别有希望在临床上有用的标志物;b)评估对相关标志物进行临床评估的最佳方法;c)确认或验证使用该标志物与仅使用标准预后因素相比是否能增加有用信息。本综述提出了一种用于癌症假定预后和预测标志物临床评估的方法,同时考虑了早期评估中的陷阱、检测方法开发和优化的原理,以及评估假定标志物临床效用的可能临床试验实例。