Ghosh Amit K
The Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Lab Clin Med. 2004 Aug;144(2):60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.lab.2004.05.013.
Evidence-based medicine helps physicians appraise the latest and best evidence and incorporate patient's values in reaching a shared clinical decision. However, many decisions in medicine are made in the paucity of best evidence. Medical uncertainty remains inherent in clinical practice and contributes to significant variability in the way physicians and patients manage medical problems. Physicians and patients have varying degrees of tolerance for uncertainty. Intolerance to uncertainty among physicians results in increased test ordering tendencies, variability in medical treatment, failure to comply with evidence-based guidelines, and even guide career choices. Factors that result in the variability of physicians' interpretation of an effective treatment include: patient factors (prioritizing some factors over others), physician factors (lack of knowledge, lack of resources, medical uncertainty), and environmental factors (limitation of time and practice). Several approaches that have been found useful in implementing evidence in clinical practice include: sending reminders to prompt physicians to perform patient-related clinical activities, introducing computer information systems to support practice, and using interactive education interventions to teach newer skills and challenge negative attitudes. Passive educational approaches, like dissemination of guidelines and didactic lectures, are usually less useful in changing behavior. Among the techniques found to be useful for managing uncertainty are shared decision making, meticulous history taking, and physical examination, excluding worrisome differential diagnosis and establishing trust in patients. The role of future studies in assessing the outcome of multiple evidence-based strategies in situations of medical uncertainty remains to be explored.
循证医学有助于医生评估最新和最佳证据,并在达成共同的临床决策时纳入患者的价值观。然而,医学中的许多决策是在缺乏最佳证据的情况下做出的。医学不确定性在临床实践中仍然是固有的,并导致医生和患者处理医疗问题的方式存在显著差异。医生和患者对不确定性有不同程度的耐受性。医生对不确定性的不耐受会导致检查开单倾向增加、医疗治疗的变异性、不遵守循证指南,甚至影响职业选择。导致医生对有效治疗的解释存在差异的因素包括:患者因素(将某些因素置于其他因素之上)、医生因素(知识缺乏、资源不足、医学不确定性)和环境因素(时间和实践的限制)。在临床实践中发现有用的几种实施证据的方法包括:发送提醒以促使医生开展与患者相关的临床活动、引入计算机信息系统以支持实践,以及使用交互式教育干预来教授新技能并挑战消极态度。被动教育方法,如指南的传播和说教式讲座,在改变行为方面通常不太有用。在发现对管理不确定性有用的技术中,有共同决策、细致的病史采集和体格检查,排除令人担忧的鉴别诊断并建立对患者的信任。未来研究在评估医学不确定性情况下多种循证策略的结果方面的作用仍有待探索。