Fujikawa Hirohisa, Ando Takayuki, Kondo Kayo, Hayashi Mikio
Center for General Medicine Education, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582 Japan.
Department of Medical Education Studies, International Research Center for Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Dec 30;35(2):969-976. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02269-5. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Ambiguity is inherent in medicine, and tolerance for ambiguity (TFA) has recently been of substantial interest. Effective medical education for TFA requires a validated inventory; one validated measure in wide use is the seven-item TFA scale. In Japan, however, a tool for measuring TFA in undergraduate medical education has not been available. Here, we aimed to develop and validate the Japanese version of the TFA scale (J-TFA scale).
We translated the original English scale into Japanese following an international guideline. We then conducted a validation survey by distributing an online anonymous self-administered questionnaire to medical students at three medical schools in Japan. We assessed the structural validity and internal reliability of consistency of the scale.
A total of 399 participants were included in our analysis. We used a split-half validation approach, with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the first half and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the second. EFA indicated a two-factor structure. CFA showed that the two-factor structure suggested by EFA had acceptable model fitness indices. Cronbach's alpha was 0.72, exceeding the satisfactory internal reliability consistency criteria.
The J-TFA scale was developed and its psychometric properties were confirmed. This instrument may be useful for future educational interventions and research on TFA.
医学中存在固有的模糊性,对模糊性的容忍度(TFA)最近备受关注。有效的TFA医学教育需要一个经过验证的量表;广泛使用的一种经过验证的测量方法是七项TFA量表。然而,在日本,本科医学教育中尚未有测量TFA的工具。在此,我们旨在开发并验证TFA量表的日语版本(J-TFA量表)。
我们按照国际指南将原始英文量表翻译成日语。然后,我们通过向日本三所医学院的医学生发放在线匿名自填问卷进行了验证调查。我们评估了该量表的结构效度和内部一致性信度。
共有399名参与者纳入我们的分析。我们采用了分半验证方法,前半部分进行探索性因子分析(EFA),后半部分进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。EFA表明为两因素结构。CFA显示,EFA提出的两因素结构具有可接受的模型拟合指数。克朗巴哈系数为0.72,超过了令人满意的内部可靠性一致性标准。
开发了J-TFA量表并确认了其心理测量特性。该工具可能对未来TFA的教育干预和研究有用。