• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在欧洲慢性病儿童样本中,该筛查工具识别有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的表现。

The performance of the screener to identify children with special health care needs in a European sample of children with chronic conditions.

作者信息

Schmidt Silke, Thyen Ute, Petersen Corinna, Bullinger Monika

机构信息

Institute and Clinic of Medical Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine S35, University Hospital of Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2004 Sep;163(9):517-23. doi: 10.1007/s00431-004-1458-1. Epub 2004 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00431-004-1458-1
PMID:15322869
Abstract

In the field of paediatric health care, measures based on consequences of health conditions have been recently developed to screen for children with special health care needs. These tools have been primarily used in survey research. The aim of this cross-sectional clinical study is to test the performance of a screener for identifying children with special health care needs (CSHCN) in a population of children with chronic conditions diagnosed and treated in different European paediatric hospitals. In the current study, the screener was employed in a sample of children with different chronic conditions (asthma, arthritis, dermatitis, epilepsy, cystic fibrosis, diabetes and cerebral palsy) across seven European countries; 456 parents of children, aged 4-7, 8-12, and 13-16 years, responded to the screener items. The study included a range of clinical measures to assess the severity of the conditions as well measures on functional health status. The prevalence of children identified positively with the CSHCN screener was 80%, which was higher than in survey estimates in the United States. Considerable variation in the screener classification was found between chronic conditions with cystic fibrosis and epilepsy showing higher rates, and skin conditions lower rates. There was no significant relationship between the screener classification and functional limitation. Findings of this study support in general the validity of the children with special health care needs screener, which shows, however, a differential validity across specific conditions. Several clinical and theoretical explanations for the lack of identifying some children with chronic conditions and the considerable variation between the conditions are discussed.

摘要

在儿科医疗保健领域,最近已开发出基于健康状况后果的措施,以筛查有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童。这些工具主要用于调查研究。这项横断面临床研究的目的是测试一种筛查工具在不同欧洲儿科医院诊断和治疗的慢性病患儿群体中识别有特殊医疗保健需求儿童(CSHCN)的性能。在当前研究中,该筛查工具应用于来自七个欧洲国家的患有不同慢性病(哮喘、关节炎、皮炎、癫痫、囊性纤维化、糖尿病和脑瘫)的儿童样本;456名年龄在4至7岁、8至12岁和13至16岁儿童的家长对筛查项目做出了回应。该研究包括一系列评估病情严重程度的临床措施以及功能健康状况的测量。被CSHCN筛查工具阳性识别的儿童患病率为80%,高于美国的调查估计值。在慢性病中,囊性纤维化和癫痫的筛查分类率较高,而皮肤病的筛查分类率较低,两者之间存在相当大的差异。筛查分类与功能受限之间没有显著关系。本研究结果总体上支持有特殊医疗保健需求儿童筛查工具的有效性,然而,该工具在特定病情中显示出不同的有效性。文中讨论了未能识别一些慢性病患儿以及不同病情之间存在显著差异的一些临床和理论解释。

相似文献

1
The performance of the screener to identify children with special health care needs in a European sample of children with chronic conditions.在欧洲慢性病儿童样本中,该筛查工具识别有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的表现。
Eur J Pediatr. 2004 Sep;163(9):517-23. doi: 10.1007/s00431-004-1458-1. Epub 2004 Jun 15.
2
Comparison of the children with special health care needs screener to the questionnaire for identifying children with chronic conditions--revised.有特殊医疗保健需求儿童筛查工具与慢性病儿童识别问卷(修订版)的比较。
Ambul Pediatr. 2002 Jan-Feb;2(1):49-57. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0049:cotcws>2.0.co;2.
3
Identifying children with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument.识别有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童:一种简短筛查工具的开发与评估
Ambul Pediatr. 2002 Jan-Feb;2(1):38-48. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0038:icwshc>2.0.co;2.
4
[The use and benefit of the 'children with special health care needs screener' in the paediatric school entrance examinations 2004/2005 in Cologne].[“有特殊医疗保健需求儿童筛查工具”在2004/2005年科隆市儿童入学考试中的应用及益处]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Feb;77(2):93-101. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1370998. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
5
Parent-Reported Health Consequences and Relationship to Expenditures in Children with ADHD.家长报告的多动症儿童的健康后果及其与支出的关系。
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Apr;20(4):915-24. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1880-1.
6
Children with special health care needs enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP): patient characteristics and health care needs.参加州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童:患者特征与医疗保健需求。
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e508.
7
An evaluation of the linguistic and cultural validity of the Spanish language version of the children with special health care needs screener.对西班牙语版特殊医疗需求儿童筛查工具的语言和文化效度评估。
Matern Child Health J. 2007 Nov;11(6):568-85. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0207-2. Epub 2007 Jun 12.
8
Internal psychometric properties of the Children with Special Health Care Needs Screener.《特殊健康需求儿童筛查器的内部心理测量特性》。
Acad Pediatr. 2011 Mar-Apr;11(2):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.11.006. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
9
Identifying children with Special Health Care Needs in Alexandria, Egypt.在埃及亚历山大识别有特殊医疗需求的儿童。
Pediatr Res. 2018 Jul;84(1):57-61. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0008-x. Epub 2018 May 23.
10
Taking stock of the CSHCN screener: a review of common questions and current reflections.评估儿童青少年慢性病患者筛选工具:常见问题与当前思考的回顾。
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Mar-Apr;15(2):165-76. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Follow-up of children and adolescents with special health care needs: Results from the KiGGS study 2003-2012.对有特殊医疗需求的儿童和青少年的随访:2003 - 2012年德国儿童青少年健康访谈与检查调查研究(KiGGS)的结果
J Health Monit. 2017 Dec 13;2(4):42-61. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-063. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
Chronic health conditions and school performance in first graders: A prospective cohort study.慢性健康状况与一年级学生的学业表现:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 27;13(3):e0194846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194846. eCollection 2018.
3
Determinants of organised sports participation patterns during the transition from childhood to adolescence in Germany: results of a nationwide cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing quality of life of children with chronic health conditions and disabilities: a European approach.评估患有慢性健康问题和残疾儿童的生活质量:一种欧洲的方法。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2002 Sep;25(3):197-206. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200209000-00005.
2
Comparing different definitions of chronic conditions in a national data set.在一个国家数据集里比较慢性病的不同定义。
Ambul Pediatr. 2002 Jan-Feb;2(1):63-70. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0063:cddocc>2.0.co;2.
3
Comparing a diagnosis list with a survey method to identify children with chronic conditions in an urban health center.
德国从童年到青春期过渡阶段有组织体育活动参与模式的决定因素:一项全国性队列研究的结果
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 6;16(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3615-7.
4
The Youth Health Care measure-satisfaction, utilization, and needs (YHC-SUN)-development of a self-report version of the Child Health Care (CHC-SUN) proxy-measure.青少年医疗保健措施——满意度、利用率及需求(YHC-SUN)——儿童医疗保健(CHC-SUN)代理测量自我报告版本的开发。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 20;16:189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1419-1.
5
Known-groups validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) in adolescents and young adults with special healthcare needs.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS(®))在有特殊医疗需求的青少年和青年中的已知群组效度。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1815-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1237-2. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
6
Taking stock of the CSHCN screener: a review of common questions and current reflections.评估儿童青少年慢性病患者筛选工具:常见问题与当前思考的回顾。
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Mar-Apr;15(2):165-76. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
7
A comparison of health-related quality of life between children with versus without special health care needs, and children requiring versus not requiring psychiatric services.比较有特殊医疗需求和无特殊医疗需求儿童、需要和不需要精神科服务儿童的健康相关生活质量。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov;21(9):1577-86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0078-2. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
8
A cognitive behavioral based group intervention for children with a chronic illness and their parents: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.基于认知行为的慢性疾病患儿及其父母团体干预:多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Pediatr. 2011 Jul 14;11:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-65.
9
The linkage between pediatric quality of life and health conditions: establishing clinically meaningful cutoff scores for the PedsQL.儿童生活质量与健康状况的关联:为 PedsQL 建立有临床意义的截断分数。
Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):773-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00487.x.
10
Health-care use and expenditures for children in special education with special health-care needs: is dual classification a marker for high use?有特殊医疗需求的特殊教育儿童的医疗保健利用情况及支出:双重分类是否是高利用率的一个标志?
Public Health Rep. 2007 Jul-Aug;122(4):531-40. doi: 10.1177/003335490712200415.
在城市健康中心,将诊断列表与一种调查方法进行比较,以识别患有慢性病的儿童。
Ambul Pediatr. 2002 Jan-Feb;2(1):58-62. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0058:cadlwa>2.0.co;2.
4
Comparison of the children with special health care needs screener to the questionnaire for identifying children with chronic conditions--revised.有特殊医疗保健需求儿童筛查工具与慢性病儿童识别问卷(修订版)的比较。
Ambul Pediatr. 2002 Jan-Feb;2(1):49-57. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0049:cotcws>2.0.co;2.
5
Identifying children with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument.识别有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童:一种简短筛查工具的开发与评估
Ambul Pediatr. 2002 Jan-Feb;2(1):38-48. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2002)002<0038:icwshc>2.0.co;2.
6
How well does the questionnaire for identifying children with chronic conditions identify individual children who have chronic conditions?用于识别慢性病患儿的问卷在识别患有慢性病的个体儿童方面效果如何?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 May;154(5):447-52. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.5.447.
7
The Nottingham Eczema Severity Score: preliminary refinement of the Rajka and Langeland grading.
Br J Dermatol. 2000 Feb;142(2):288-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03300.x.
8
A new definition of children with special health care needs.有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的新定义。
Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1 Pt 1):137-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.1.137.
9
An epidemiologic profile of children with special health care needs.有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的流行病学概况。
Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1 Pt 1):117-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.1.117.
10
Families' recommendations for improving services for children with chronic conditions.家庭对改善慢性病患儿服务的建议。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 May;152(5):440-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.5.440.