Suppr超能文献

血管性痴呆的诊断、危险因素及治疗

Diagnosis, risk factors, and treatment of vascular dementia.

作者信息

Lopez Oscar L, Kuller Lewis H, Becker James T

机构信息

Department of Neurology, 3501 Forbes Avenue, Suite 830, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2004 Sep;4(5):358-67. doi: 10.1007/s11910-004-0082-9.

Abstract

Although the introduction of modern neuroimaging techniques and standardized clinical evaluations has improved the identification of cerebrovascular disease, the clinical diagnosis of vascular dementia (VaD) is still problematic. Neuropathologic studies have found the current clinical criteria for VaD had low sensitivity with high specificity, suggesting that cerebrovascular disease of sufficient severity to cause cognitive deficits is frequently associated with other disease processes (eg, Alzheimer's disease). The critical factors about the diagnosis of VaD are centered on two issues: definition of dementia and determination of vascular disease. The current clinical criteria for VaD have different definitions of dementia, which are mainly based on an Alzheimer's disease-like presentation, and severe vascular disease can present with or without history of clinical strokes. Therefore, there is a need for a better definition of VaD. This is extremely important to better understand its risk factors, as well as to create homogenous cohorts suitable for drug trials.

摘要

尽管现代神经影像学技术和标准化临床评估方法的引入提高了脑血管疾病的识别率,但血管性痴呆(VaD)的临床诊断仍然存在问题。神经病理学研究发现,目前VaD的临床标准敏感性低而特异性高,这表明足以导致认知缺陷的严重脑血管疾病常与其他疾病过程(如阿尔茨海默病)相关。VaD诊断的关键因素集中在两个问题上:痴呆的定义和血管疾病的判定。目前VaD的临床标准对痴呆有不同的定义,主要基于类似阿尔茨海默病的表现,严重血管疾病可能有或没有临床中风史。因此,需要对VaD进行更好的定义。这对于更好地理解其危险因素以及创建适合药物试验的同质队列极为重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验