Suppr超能文献

胰蛋白酶和纤溶酶在药物性玻璃体溶解中的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of dispase and plasmin in pharmacologic vitreolysis.

作者信息

Wang Fenghua, Wang Zhiliang, Sun Xiaodong, Wang Fang, Xu Xun, Zhang Xi

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3286-90. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0026.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dispase and plasmin when inducing posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) by intravitreous injection in rabbit eyes.

METHODS

Forty-eight young pigmented rabbits were randomized into six groups. Groups 1 and 5 received 0.025 U dispase in test eyes; group 2, 0.1 U dispase; groups 3 and 6, 1 U plasmin; and group 4, 4 U plasmin. All groups received PBS in control eyes. Groups 5 and 6 were euthanatized 15 minutes after surgery for ocular histologic examination. The remaining groups (groups 1-4) received indirect ophthalmoscope and biomicroscopy 15 and 30 minutes; 1, 2, and 8 hours; and 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery. Ultrasonography and electroretinogram were performed 1 hour and 1 and 7 days after surgery. The eyes then were examined by scanning and transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Partial or complete PVDs were observed in the eyes that received dispase and plasmin, confirmed by the results of scanning electron microscopy. Light microscopy showed inflammation in both dispase- and plasmin-treated eyes of groups 5 and 6. However, whereas in plasmin-treated eyes the ERG and cell ultrastructure showed no significant changes, in dispase-treated eyes, the amplitudes of ERG showed a significant reduction from baseline and ultrastructural damage to the retina was detected by transmission electron microscopy. Cell damage, preretinal hemorrhage, and cataract were also observed in these eyes. No changes were observed in the control eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal injection of dispase at 0.025 U or more can induce PVD, but it is not safe. Plasmin (1-4 U) is safer, except for the potential risk of inducing intraocular inflammation.

摘要

目的

评估玻璃体内注射dispase和纤溶酶诱导兔眼玻璃体后脱离(PVD)的安全性和有效性。

方法

48只年轻有色家兔被随机分为6组。第1组和第5组的试验眼注射0.025 U dispase;第2组注射0.1 U dispase;第3组和第6组注射1 U纤溶酶;第4组注射4 U纤溶酶。所有组的对照眼注射磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)。第5组和第6组在手术后15分钟处死用于眼部组织学检查。其余组(第1 - 4组)在手术后15分钟和30分钟、1小时、2小时和8小时以及1天、3天和7天接受间接检眼镜和生物显微镜检查。在手术后1小时、1天和7天进行超声检查和视网膜电图检查。然后通过扫描和透射电子显微镜检查眼睛。

结果

扫描电子显微镜结果证实,接受dispase和纤溶酶注射的眼中观察到部分或完全PVD。光学显微镜显示第5组和第6组中接受dispase和纤溶酶治疗的眼睛均有炎症。然而,虽然纤溶酶治疗的眼睛视网膜电图和细胞超微结构无明显变化,但dispase治疗的眼睛视网膜电图振幅较基线显著降低,透射电子显微镜检测到视网膜超微结构损伤。这些眼睛还观察到细胞损伤、视网膜前出血和白内障。对照眼中未观察到变化。

结论

玻璃体内注射0.025 U或更高剂量的dispase可诱导PVD,但不安全。纤溶酶(1 - 4 U)更安全,除了有诱发眼内炎症的潜在风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验