• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年性犯罪再犯风险评估量表(ERASOR):初步心理测量数据。

The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): preliminary psychometric data.

作者信息

Worling James R

机构信息

Sexual Abuse: Family Education & Treatment Program, Thistletown Regional Centre for Children and Adolescents, Ontario Ministry of Community, Family and Children's Services, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2004 Jun;16(3):235-54. doi: 10.1177/107906320401600305.

DOI:10.1177/107906320401600305
PMID:15326883
Abstract

The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR) is an empirically guided checklist designed to assist clinicians to estimate the short-term risk of a sexual reoffense for youth aged 12-18 years of age. The ERASOR provides objective coding instructions for 25 risk factors (16 dynamic and 9 static). To investigate the psychometric properties, risk ratings were collected from 28 clinicians who evaluated 136 adolescent males (aged 12-18 years) following comprehensive, clinical assessments. Preliminary psychometric data (i.e., interrater agreement, item-total correlation, internal consistency) were found to be supportive of the reliability and item composition of the tool. ERASOR ratings also significantly discriminated adolescents based on whether or not they had previously been sanctioned for a prior sexual offense.

摘要

青少年性犯罪再犯风险评估量表(ERASOR)是一个基于实证的检查表,旨在帮助临床医生评估12至18岁青少年性犯罪再次发生的短期风险。ERASOR为25个风险因素(16个动态因素和9个静态因素)提供了客观的编码说明。为了研究其心理测量特性,从28名临床医生那里收集了风险评分,这些医生在全面的临床评估后对136名12至18岁的青少年男性进行了评估。初步的心理测量数据(即评分者间一致性、项目与总分的相关性、内部一致性)支持了该工具的可靠性和项目构成。ERASOR评分还根据青少年以前是否因性犯罪受到过制裁,对他们进行了显著区分。

相似文献

1
The Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): preliminary psychometric data.青少年性犯罪再犯风险评估量表(ERASOR):初步心理测量数据。
Sex Abuse. 2004 Jun;16(3):235-54. doi: 10.1177/107906320401600305.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Sexual Offense Version.青少年性犯罪版暴力风险量表的有效性和可靠性。
Sex Abuse. 2020 Oct;32(7):826-849. doi: 10.1177/1079063219858064. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).青少年性犯罪再犯风险估计(ERASOR)的前瞻性有效性。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Jun;24(3):203-23. doi: 10.1177/1079063211407080. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
4
Emerging strategies for risk assessment of sexually abusive youth: theory, controversy and practice.性虐待青少年风险评估的新兴策略:理论、争议与实践。
J Child Sex Abus. 2004;13(3-4):83-105. doi: 10.1300/j070v13n03_05.
5
Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: a meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99.青少年性再犯预测:J-SOAP-II、ERASOR、J-SORRAT-II 和 Static-99 的荟萃分析
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Oct;36(5):423-38. doi: 10.1037/h0093938. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
6
A prospective investigation of factors that predict desistance from recidivism for adolescents who have sexually offended.对有性犯罪行为青少年再犯停止因素的前瞻性调查。
Sex Abuse. 2015 Feb;27(1):127-42. doi: 10.1177/1079063214549260. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
7
Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/CMI in a non-Western context.评估有性犯罪的青少年:ERASOR、J-SOAP-II 和 YLS/CMI 在非西方背景下的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Apr;24(2):153-74. doi: 10.1177/1079063211404250. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
8
Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth.测试性虐待青少年犯罪风险评估工具的有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Nov;30(11):1430-1443. doi: 10.1037/pas0000590. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Sexual offense adjudication and sexual recidivism among juvenile offenders.青少年罪犯中的性犯罪裁决与性再犯
Sex Abuse. 2007 Jun;19(2):107-13. doi: 10.1177/107906320701900203. Epub 2007 May 26.
10
An investigation of successfully treated adolescent sex offenders.对成功矫治的青少年性犯罪者的一项调查。
J Child Sex Abus. 2004;13(3-4):295-317. doi: 10.1300/j070v13n03_15.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a violence risk screening for youth in psychiatric inpatient care-a pilot study of V-RISK-Y.精神科住院护理中青少年暴力风险筛查的验证——V-RISK-Y的一项试点研究
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 26;14:1210871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1210871. eCollection 2023.
2
Children of ISIS: considerations regarding trauma, treatment and risk.伊斯兰国的孩子们:关于创伤、治疗与风险的考量
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 May 26;29(1):107-133. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1904448. eCollection 2022.
3
The predictive and incremental validity of ADHD beyond the VRAG-R in a high-risk sample of young offenders.
ADHD 在高危青年罪犯 VRAG-R 之外的预测和增量有效性。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Dec;272(8):1469-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01352-x. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
4
Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) interventions for young people aged 10 to 18 with harmful sexual behaviour.针对10至18岁有有害性行为的年轻人的认知行为疗法(CBT)干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 22;6(6):CD009829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009829.pub2.
5
The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the treatment of adolescent sexual offenders with paraphilic disorders.世界生物精神病学协会联合会(WFSBP)关于患有性偏好障碍的青少年性犯罪者治疗的指南。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2016;17(1):2-38. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2015.1085598. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
6
Risk and Criminogenic Needs of Youth Who Sexually Offended in Singapore: An Examination of Two Typologies.新加坡性犯罪青少年的风险与犯罪ogenic需求:两种类型的考察。 (注:“criminogenic”可能是“犯罪ogenic”有误,准确的词可能是“criminogenic”,意为“产生犯罪的” ,若按此准确词汇,完整译文为:新加坡性犯罪青少年的风险与产生犯罪的需求:两种类型的考察。 )
Sex Abuse. 2015 Oct;27(5):479-95. doi: 10.1177/1079063213520044. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
7
Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/CMI in a non-Western context.评估有性犯罪的青少年:ERASOR、J-SOAP-II 和 YLS/CMI 在非西方背景下的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Apr;24(2):153-74. doi: 10.1177/1079063211404250. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
8
Assessing sexual arousal with adolescent males who have offended sexually: self-report and unobtrusively measured viewing time.对有性犯罪行为的青少年男性的性唤起进行评估:自我报告与非侵入性测量的观看时间。
Sex Abuse. 2006 Oct;18(4):383-400. doi: 10.1177/107906320601800406.