Suppr超能文献

拉莫三嗪与丙戊酸作为新诊断的典型失神发作一线单药治疗的比较:一项开放标签、随机、平行组研究。

Lamotrigine versus valproic acid as first-line monotherapy in newly diagnosed typical absence seizures: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study.

作者信息

Coppola Giangennaro, Auricchio Gianfranca, Federico Rosario, Carotenuto Marco, Pascotto Antonio

机构信息

Clinic of Child Neuropsychiatry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2004 Sep;45(9):1049-53. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.40903.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed children and adolescents with typical absence seizures.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label parallel-group design was used. After undergoing an awake video-EEG recording, which included one to two trials of 3 min of hyperventilation and intermittent photic stimulation, eligible patients were randomized to receive LTG or VPA. LTG was initiated at a daily dose of 0.5 mg/kg for 2 weeks in two divided doses, followed by 1.0 mg/kg/day for an additional 2 weeks. Thereafter, doses were increased in 1-mg/kg/day increments every 5 days until seizures were controlled, intolerable adverse effects occurred, or a maximum dose of 12 mg/kg/day had been reached. VPA was equally uptitrated according to clinical response, starting at 10 mg/kg and increasing by 5 mg/kg/24 h every 3 days, if required, to a maximum of 30 mg/kg/day in three divided doses. Patients were seen in the clinic every month for < or = 12 months. The primary efficacy end point at each visit was seizure freedom, defined as lack of clinically observed seizures since the previous visit and lack of electroclinical seizures during ambulatory 24-h EEG testing and a video-EEG session with hyperventilation.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight children (17 boys, 21 girls), aged from 3 to 13 years (mean, 7.5 years), all newly diagnosed with childhood or juvenile typical absence seizures, were enrolled. After 1 month of treatment, 10 (52.6%) of 19 children taking VPA and one (5.3%) of 19 taking LTG were seizure free (p = 0.004). By the 3-month follow-up, 12 (63.1%) children taking VPA and seven (36.8%) taking LTG were controlled (p = 0.19). After 12 months, 13 children taking VPA (dose range, 20-30 mg/kg/day; mean serum level, 76.8 mg/L; range, 51.4-91 mg/L) and 10 taking LTG (dose range, 2-11 mg/kg/day; mean serum level, 8.1 mg/L; range, 1.1-18 mg/L) were seizure free (p = 0.51). Side effects were mostly mild and transient and were recorded in two (10.6%) children treated with VPA and in six (31.8%) treated with LTG.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VPA and LTG can be efficacious against absence seizures, although VPA shows a much faster onset of action, at least in part because of its shorter titration schedule.

摘要

目的

比较拉莫三嗪(LTG)和丙戊酸(VPA)对新诊断的儿童及青少年典型失神发作的疗效。

方法

采用随机、开放标签平行组设计。在进行清醒视频脑电图记录(包括1至2次3分钟的过度换气和间歇性光刺激试验)后,符合条件的患者被随机分配接受LTG或VPA治疗。LTG起始剂量为每日0.5mg/kg,分两次给药,持续2周,随后以每日1.0mg/kg的剂量再给药2周。此后,每5天剂量增加1mg/kg/天,直至癫痫发作得到控制、出现无法耐受的不良反应或达到最大剂量12mg/kg/天。VPA根据临床反应同样进行滴定,起始剂量为10mg/kg,如有需要,每3天增加5mg/kg/24小时,最大剂量为每日30mg/kg,分三次给药。患者每月到门诊就诊,为期≤12个月。每次就诊时的主要疗效终点为无癫痫发作,定义为自上次就诊后未观察到临床癫痫发作,且在动态24小时脑电图检查以及过度换气的视频脑电图检查期间无电临床癫痫发作。

结果

纳入了38名年龄在3至13岁(平均7.5岁)的儿童(17名男孩,21名女孩),均为新诊断的儿童或青少年典型失神发作。治疗1个月后,服用VPA的19名儿童中有10名(52.6%)无癫痫发作,服用LTG的19名儿童中有1名(5.3%)无癫痫发作(p = 0.004)。到3个月随访时,服用VPA的12名儿童(63.1%)和服用LTG的7名儿童(36.8%)癫痫发作得到控制(p = 0.19)。12个月后,服用VPA的13名儿童(剂量范围为20 - 30mg/kg/天;平均血清水平为76.8mg/L;范围为51.4 - 91mg/L)和服用LTG的10名儿童(剂量范围为2 - 11mg/kg/天;平均血清水平为8.1mg/L;范围为1.1 - 18mg/L)无癫痫发作(p = 0.51)。副作用大多轻微且短暂,服用VPA治疗的2名儿童(10.6%)和服用LTG治疗的6名儿童(31.8%)记录有副作用。

结论

VPA和LTG对失神发作均有效,尽管VPA起效快得多,至少部分原因是其滴定时间表较短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验