Altintaş Engin, Ulu Oğuz, Sezgin Orhan, Aydin Ozlem, Camdeviren Handan
Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Faculty Hospital, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;15(2):90-3.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Helicobacter pylori is the most common infectious disease all over the world. Ten to twenty percent of the patients remain infected despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), amoxicillin and clarithromycin. We compared PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole with ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole in cases resistant to PPIs-based triple therapies.
The study included 52 patients who underwent a triple therapy with PPI, clarithromycin and amoxicillin for 14 days between September 2001 and December 2002, and were found to be resistant to the therapy. They were randomized to take ranitidine bismuth citrate (Rb) 400 mg twice a day, tetracycline (T) 1 g twice a day and metronidazole (M) 500 mg three times a day for 14 days (RbTM), or ranitidine bismuth citrate (Rb) 400 mg twice a day for 14 days and azithromycin (A) 500 mg once a day for 7 days (RbA). Four weeks after the treatment, endoscopies were repeated, and patients were assessed with respect to changes in symptoms. When H. pylori was negative on histological analysis and urease test, eradication was achieved.
A total of 52 patients, 32 females and 20 males with a mean age of 49+/-12 years, were included in the study. Eradication was achieved in 15 (28%) out of 52 patients in total. There was a significant difference between RbA and RbTM groups (p=0.01). In fact, H. pylori was eradicated in 3 (12%) out of 25 patients in the RbA group, whereas it was eradicated in 12 (44.4%) out of 27 patients in the RbTM group. Symptom scores significantly improved in both groups after the treatment, though there was not a significant difference between the groups (p=0.705).
Triple therapy including azithromycin does not seem to be a good choice in cases resistant to the first line therapies; however, a similarly lower rate of eradication was achieved with the quadruple therapy proposed. Therefore, different treatment schemes should be applied in resistant patients, and further studies are needed as well.
背景/目的:幽门螺杆菌感染是全球最常见的传染病。尽管使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)、阿莫西林和克拉霉素进行治疗,仍有10%至20%的患者持续感染。我们比较了PPI、铋剂、四环素和甲硝唑与枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁、四环素和甲硝唑在基于PPI的三联疗法耐药病例中的疗效。
该研究纳入了52例患者,这些患者在2001年9月至2002年12月期间接受了PPI、克拉霉素和阿莫西林的三联疗法治疗14天,结果显示对该疗法耐药。他们被随机分为两组,一组每天两次服用400毫克枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁(Rb)、每天两次服用1克四环素(T)和每天三次服用500毫克甲硝唑(M),共治疗14天(RbTM组);另一组每天两次服用400毫克枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁(Rb),共治疗14天,以及每天一次服用500毫克阿奇霉素(A),共治疗7天(RbA组)。治疗四周后,重复进行内镜检查,并根据症状变化对患者进行评估。当组织学分析和尿素酶试验显示幽门螺杆菌为阴性时,即实现根除。
该研究共纳入52例患者,其中女性32例,男性20例,平均年龄49±12岁。52例患者中共有15例(28%)实现了根除。RbA组和RbTM组之间存在显著差异(p = 0.01)。实际上,RbA组25例患者中有3例(12%)幽门螺杆菌被根除,而RbTM组27例患者中有12例(44.4%)幽门螺杆菌被根除。治疗后两组的症状评分均显著改善,但两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.705)。
对于一线治疗耐药的病例,包含阿奇霉素的三联疗法似乎不是一个好的选择;然而,所提出的四联疗法的根除率同样较低。因此,对于耐药患者应采用不同的治疗方案,并且还需要进一步的研究。