Azoulay Elie, Pochard Frédéric, Chevret Sylvie, Adrie Christophe, Annane Djilali, Bleichner Gérard, Bornstain Caroline, Bouffard Yves, Cohen Yves, Feissel Marc, Goldgran-Toledano Dany, Guitton Christophe, Hayon Jan, Iglesias Esther, Joly Luc-Marie, Jourdain Mercé, Laplace Christian, Lebert Christine, Pingat Juliette, Poisson Catherine, Renault Anne, Sanchez Olivier, Selcer Dominique, Timsit Jean-François, Le Gall Jean-Roger, Schlemmer Benoît
Intensive Care Unit of the Saint-Louis Teaching Hospital and University of Paris 7, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;32(9):1832-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000139693.88931.59.
To evaluate the opinions of intensive care unit staff and family members about family participation in decisions about patients in intensive care units in France, a country where the approach of physicians to patients and families has been described as paternalistic.
Prospective multiple-center survey of intensive care unit staff and family members.
Seventy-eight intensive care units in university-affiliated hospitals in France.
We studied 357 consecutive patients hospitalized in the 78 intensive care units and included in the study starting on May 1, 2001, with five patients included per intensive care unit.
We recorded opinions and experience about family participation in medical decision making. Comprehension, satisfaction, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were determined in family members.
Poor comprehension was noted in 35% of family members. Satisfaction was good but anxiety was noted in 73% and depression in 35% of family members. Among intensive care unit staff members, 91% of physicians and 83% of nonphysicians believed that participation in decision making should be offered to families; however, only 39% had actually involved family members in decisions. A desire to share in decision making was expressed by only 47% of family members. Only 15% of family members actually shared in decision making. Effectiveness of information influenced this desire.
Intensive care unit staff should seek to determine how much autonomy families want. Staff members must strive to identify practical and psychological obstacles that may limit their ability to promote autonomy. Finally, they must develop interventions and attitudes capable of empowering families.
在法国,医生对患者及家属的态度被描述为家长式作风。本研究旨在评估重症监护病房医护人员及家属对于家属参与重症监护病房患者决策的看法。
对重症监护病房医护人员及家属进行前瞻性多中心调查。
法国大学附属医院的78个重症监护病房。
我们研究了在这78个重症监护病房连续住院的357例患者,这些患者于2001年5月1日开始纳入研究,每个重症监护病房纳入5例患者。
我们记录了关于家属参与医疗决策的意见和经验。测定了家属的理解能力、满意度以及医院焦虑抑郁量表得分。
35%的家属理解能力较差。满意度良好,但73%的家属存在焦虑,35%的家属存在抑郁。在重症监护病房医护人员中,91%的医生和83%的非医生认为应让家属参与决策;然而,实际上只有39%的人让家属参与了决策。只有47%的家属表示希望参与决策。只有15%的家属实际参与了决策。信息的有效性影响了这种意愿。
重症监护病房的医护人员应设法确定家属希望拥有多大程度的自主权。工作人员必须努力识别可能限制他们促进自主权能力的实际和心理障碍。最后,他们必须制定能够赋予家属权力的干预措施和态度。