Wall Richard J, Engelberg Ruth A, Downey Lois, Heyland Daren K, Curtis J Randall
Harborview Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):271-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50.
To refine the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey and develop a validated method for scoring the instrument.
Instrument development study, using data from two prospective cohort studies.
Intensive care units in seven university-affiliated hospitals (six Canadian, one United States).
Family members of ICU patients.
Based on a priori criteria, items were tagged for potential removal and discussed with the FS-ICU developers. Factor analysis was used to test the conceptual structure of the instrument and develop a scoring method based on scales and subscales. The new scoring method was validated in the U.S. cohort using the Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) instrument and nurse-assessed quality indicators.
A total of 1,038 family members completed the FS-ICU across seven sites. Fifteen items were initially tagged for possible removal. After consensus with the developers, ten items were dropped (and 24 were retained in the final instrument). Factor analysis explained 61.3% of the total variance using a two-factor model. The first factor pertained to satisfaction with care (14 items). The second factor encompassed satisfaction with decision making (10 items). A scoring method was developed based on this conceptual model. In validity testing, the FS-ICU was significantly correlated with the Family-QODD total score (Spearman's .56, p < .001) as well as individual QODD items such as quality of care by all providers (.64, p < .001). The FS-ICU also correlated significantly with multiple nurse-assessed quality indicators.
The shortened FS-ICU measures two main conceptual domains-satisfaction with care and satisfaction with decision making. Scores on the FS-ICU show good validity against other indicators of ICU quality. The instrument holds promise as a useful outcome measure in studies that attempt to improve this component of ICU care.
完善重症监护病房患者家属满意度(FS-ICU)调查问卷,并开发一种经过验证的该工具评分方法。
采用两项前瞻性队列研究的数据进行工具开发研究。
七所大学附属医院的重症监护病房(六所位于加拿大,一所位于美国)。
重症监护病房患者的家属。
根据先验标准,标记可能删除的条目,并与FS-ICU开发者进行讨论。采用因子分析来测试该工具的概念结构,并基于量表和子量表开发一种评分方法。在美国队列中,使用死亡质量(QODD)工具和护士评估的质量指标对新的评分方法进行验证。
七个研究地点共有1038名家属完成了FS-ICU调查问卷。最初标记了15个可能删除的条目。与开发者达成共识后,删除了10个条目(最终问卷保留24个条目)。采用双因素模型的因子分析解释了总方差的61.3%。第一个因子与对护理的满意度有关(14个条目)。第二个因子包括对决策的满意度(10个条目)。基于这一概念模型开发了一种评分方法。在效度测试中,FS-ICU与家庭QODD总分显著相关(斯皮尔曼相关系数为0.56,p < 0.001),也与QODD的各个项目显著相关,如所有医护人员的护理质量(相关系数为0.64,p < 0.001)。FS-ICU还与多项护士评估的质量指标显著相关。
缩短后的FS-ICU测量两个主要概念领域——对护理的满意度和对决策的满意度。FS-ICU的得分与重症监护病房质量的其他指标相比具有良好的效度。该工具有望成为旨在改善重症监护病房护理这一组成部分的研究中一种有用的结局指标。