Hartog Christiane S, Schwarzkopf Daniel, Riedemann Niels C, Pfeifer Ruediger, Guenther Albrecht, Egerland Kati, Sprung Charles L, Hoyer Heike, Gensichen Jochen, Reinhart Konrad
Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Palliat Med. 2015 Apr;29(4):336-45. doi: 10.1177/0269216314560007. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
Communication is a hallmark of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. It may influence the impact of end-of-life care on patients' relatives. We aimed to assess end-of-life care and communication from the perspective of intensive care unit staff and relate it to relatives' psychological symptoms.
Prospective observational study based on consecutive patients with severe sepsis receiving end-of-life care; trial registration NCT01247792.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Four interdisciplinary intensive care units of a German University hospital. Responsible health personnel (attendings, residents and nurses) were questioned on the day of the first end-of-life decision (to withdraw or withhold life-supporting therapies) and after patients had died or were discharged. Relatives were interviewed by phone after 90 days.
Overall, 145 patients, 610 caregiver responses (92% response) and 84 relative interviews (70% response) were analysed. Most (86%) end-of-life decisions were initiated by attendings and only 2% by nurses; 41% of nurses did not know enough about end-of-life decisions to communicate with relatives. Discomfort with end-of-life decisions was low. Relatives reported high satisfaction with decision-making and care, 87% thought their degree of involvement had been just right. However, 51%, 48% or 33% of relatives had symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety or depression, respectively. Predictors for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder were patient age and relatives' gender. Relatives' satisfaction with medical care and communication predicted less anxiety (p = 0.025).
Communication should be improved within the intensive care unit caregiver team to strengthen the involvement of nurses in end-of-life care. Improved communication between caregivers and the family might lessen relatives' long-term anxiety.
沟通是重症监护病房临终关怀的一个标志。它可能会影响临终关怀对患者亲属的影响。我们旨在从重症监护病房工作人员的角度评估临终关怀与沟通情况,并将其与亲属的心理症状联系起来。
基于接受临终关怀的连续性严重脓毒症患者的前瞻性观察性研究;试验注册号NCT01247792。
设置/参与者:德国一家大学医院的四个跨学科重症监护病房。在做出首个临终决定(停止或放弃维持生命的治疗)当天以及患者死亡或出院后,对负责的医护人员(主治医师、住院医师和护士)进行询问。在90天后通过电话对亲属进行访谈。
总体而言,分析了145名患者、610份护理人员回复(回复率92%)和84份亲属访谈(回复率70%)。大多数(86%)临终决定由主治医师发起,只有2%由护士发起;41%的护士对临终决定了解不足,无法与亲属沟通。对临终决定的不适感较低。亲属对决策和护理的满意度较高,87%的人认为他们的参与程度恰到好处。然而,分别有51%、48%或33%的亲属有创伤后应激障碍、焦虑或抑郁症状。抑郁和创伤后应激障碍的预测因素是患者年龄和亲属性别。亲属对医疗护理和沟通的满意度预示着焦虑程度较低(p = 0.025)。
应改善重症监护病房护理团队内部的沟通,以加强护士在临终关怀中的参与度。护理人员与家属之间改善沟通可能会减轻亲属的长期焦虑。