• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为衡量慢性疼痛患者功能障碍的慢性病问题量表。

The Chronic Illness Problem Inventory as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients.

作者信息

Romano Joan M, Turner Judith A, Jensen Mark P

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA Multidisciplinary Pain Center, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.

出版信息

Pain. 1992 Apr;49(1):71-75. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90190-M.

DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90190-M
PMID:1534401
Abstract

Assessment of physical and psychosocial dysfunction is recognized as essential in chronic pain patient evaluation. One instrument, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), has demonstrated good reliability and validity as a measure of dysfunction among chronic pain patients. An alternate measure, the Chronic Illness Problem Inventory (CIPI), is shorter and more easily scored than the SIP, but as yet has not been applied widely to chronic pain problems. In the present study, 95 chronic low back pain patients completed the SIP, the CIPI, activity diaries, the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D), before participating in a chronic pain treatment study. Overt pain behaviors were also coded from videotapes of a standardized assessment protocol. Seventy-five subjects completed the measures post-treatment. The results indicate that although the SIP and the CIPI are significantly correlated and appear to be measuring similar constructs, there is also substantial unshared variance between them, suggesting that they may tap somewhat different aspects of dysfunction in chronic pain. The CIPI shows promise as a useful alternative measure of dysfunction in chronic low back pain patients, but requires further validation for this purpose.

摘要

在慢性疼痛患者评估中,对身体和心理社会功能障碍的评估被认为是至关重要的。一种工具,即疾病影响量表(SIP),已证明作为慢性疼痛患者功能障碍的一种测量方法具有良好的信度和效度。另一种测量方法,即慢性病问题量表(CIPI),比SIP更简短且评分更容易,但尚未广泛应用于慢性疼痛问题。在本研究中,95名慢性下腰痛患者在参与一项慢性疼痛治疗研究之前,完成了SIP、CIPI、活动日记、麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)以及流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)。还从标准化评估方案的录像带中对明显的疼痛行为进行了编码。75名受试者在治疗后完成了这些测量。结果表明,尽管SIP和CIPI显著相关且似乎在测量相似的结构,但它们之间也存在大量未共享的方差,这表明它们可能在慢性疼痛中挖掘功能障碍的不同方面。CIPI有望成为慢性下腰痛患者功能障碍的一种有用替代测量方法,但为此需要进一步验证。

相似文献

1
The Chronic Illness Problem Inventory as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients.作为衡量慢性疼痛患者功能障碍的慢性病问题量表。
Pain. 1992 Apr;49(1):71-75. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90190-M.
2
Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients.
Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):157-162. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90156-6.
3
The sickness impact profile: a global measure of disability in chronic low back pain.疾病影响概况:慢性下腰痛残疾程度的一项全球指标。
Pain. 1985 Jan;21(1):67-76. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90078-8.
4
Measuring participation in patients with chronic back pain-the 5-Item Pain Disability Index.测量慢性腰痛患者的参与度——5 项疼痛残疾指数。
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):307-313. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.172. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain.疾病影响量表与较短量表在腰痛功能评估中的比较效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Nov;11(9):951-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198611000-00017.
6
Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain.测量腰痛患者的身体和心理社会功能。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Sep;8(6):635-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198309000-00009.
7
The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders.疼痛残疾问卷:一种用于慢性肌肉骨骼疾病的新的心理测量学上可靠的测量工具。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2290-302; discussion 2303. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142221.88111.0f.
8
Development of a chronic pain-specific version of the Sickness Impact Profile.《疾病影响量表》慢性疼痛特定版本的开发。
Health Psychol. 2016 Mar;35(3):228-237. doi: 10.1037/hea0000257. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
9
The impact of psychologic factors on measurement of functional status. Assessment of the sickness impact profile.心理因素对功能状态测量的影响。疾病影响状况评估。
Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9):793-804. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199009000-00009.
10
Site of pain: relationship to measures of pain description, behavior and personality.疼痛部位:与疼痛描述、行为及个性测量指标的关系。
Pain. 1984 Aug;19(4):389-397. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90085-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review of content and format.患者报告的体力活动问卷:内容和格式的系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Mar 13;10:28. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-28.
2
Reliability, validity and psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale.流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)希腊语翻译版的信度、效度及心理测量特性
BMC Psychiatry. 2001;1:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-244x-1-3. Epub 2001 Jun 20.