Baruch Y, Enat R, Gershoni-Baruch R, Rimon N, Ben-Porath E
Department of Medicine B, Rambam Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 May;87(5):613-6.
Two methods were used to unveil a possible previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with postnecrotic liver cirrhosis. The anamnestic response to a booster injection of HB vaccine was assessed, and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique for the detection of HBV-DNA in serum and liver tissue, using primers to span the precore and core regions, was employed. Seventeen patients with postnecrotic liver cirrhosis were selected from a population with a high prevalence of HBV infection and were compared with 11 liver cirrhosis patients who were positive for antibodies to surface antigen (anti-HBs) IgG antibodies. All patients were given one dose of HB vaccine into the deltoid muscle, and anti-HBs titers were measured 1 and 4 wk after injection. Three of 17 patients, initially negative for anti-HBs, showed a primary response, with titers of anti-HBs rising from 0 to a maximum of 85 mIU/ml after 4 wk; the rest had no response. Of the 11 patients positive for anti-HBs, of whom nine were also IgG anti-HBs positive, only four had an intense anamnestic response, with anti-HBs titers rising to more than 10 times the initial values (up to 10,800 mIU/ml). Serum HBV-DNA was detected in eight patients in the antibody-negative group and in only one patient in the antibody-positive group (p less than 0.02). None of the four patients with positive anamnestic response had HBV-DNA in the serum. The prevalence of HBV-DNA in the liver was similar in both groups. Absence of HBV-DNA in serum of most patients positive for anti-HBs supports the hypothesis that HBV particles released from the liver may be captured by antibodies in the serum. We conclude that assessment of the anamnestic response to HB vaccine has no diagnostic advantage, compared with direct measurement of conventional HBV serological markers in patients with liver cirrhosis. Moreover, we suggest that this type of immunologic response may not occur when virion-associated HBV-DNA is present in the serum.
采用两种方法来揭示坏死性肝硬化患者既往是否可能感染过乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)。评估了对乙肝疫苗加强注射的回忆反应,并采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术,使用跨越前核心区和核心区的引物检测血清和肝组织中的HBV-DNA。从HBV感染高流行人群中选取17例坏死性肝硬化患者,并与11例表面抗原抗体(抗-HBs)IgG抗体阳性的肝硬化患者进行比较。所有患者均在三角肌注射一剂乙肝疫苗,并在注射后1周和4周测量抗-HBs滴度。17例最初抗-HBs阴性的患者中,3例出现初次反应,抗-HBs滴度在4周后从0升至最高85 mIU/ml;其余患者无反应。在11例抗-HBs阳性的患者中,其中9例也是IgG抗-HBs阳性,只有4例有强烈的回忆反应,抗-HBs滴度升至初始值的10倍以上(高达10800 mIU/ml)。抗体阴性组8例患者血清中检测到HBV-DNA,抗体阳性组仅1例患者检测到(p<0.02)。4例回忆反应阳性的患者血清中均未检测到HBV-DNA。两组肝组织中HBV-DNA的流行率相似。大多数抗-HBs阳性患者血清中未检测到HBV-DNA,支持肝脏释放的HBV颗粒可能被血清中的抗体捕获这一假说。我们得出结论,与直接检测肝硬化患者常规HBV血清学标志物相比,评估对乙肝疫苗的回忆反应没有诊断优势。此外,我们认为当血清中存在病毒体相关的HBV-DNA时,可能不会发生这种类型的免疫反应。