Ito Kazuto
Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine Maebashi, 371-8511.
Rinsho Byori. 2004 Jul;52(7):611-7.
As the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in most Western countries, prostate cancer represents a significant health care problem. The introduction of routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for asymptomatic men is still controversial. To solve uncertainties regarding the screening for prostate cancer, prospective randomized controlled trials are ongoing in the USA and Europe. The development of an optimal screening system may be one of the most important issues for screening for prostate cancer, and it should be set not only for reducing the mortality rate of prostate cancer, but also for reducing the cost. The best screening modality for the 1st step of mass screening for prostate cancer is the PSA test. Furthermore, the cut-off value should be set in an age-specific manner. The risk of developing prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of 4.0 ng/ml or lower increases when the baseline PSA levels are higher. Therefore, re-screening for men without suspicious findings for prostate cancer at the 1st step of screening should be set relative to the baseline PSA and digital rectal examination status. In the 2nd step of screening, the PSA density adjusted by the transition zone volume (PSATZD) and free/total PSA ratio (%f-PSA) may be useful in the selecting patients who should be biopsied. The optimal cut-offs for PSATZD and %f-PSA have not been confirmed, however, and an age-adjusted setting should be considered to detect clinically significant cancer. The method of prostate biopsy is also very important for improving the diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer. The number of biopsy cores should be set relative to prostate volume. Furthermore, the clinically significant tumor volume may be smaller in younger men than in older men. Therefore, the optimal number of biopsy cores should be set according to age and prostate volume. Both an optimal screening system and minimally invasive treatments will be available in the future, and screening for prostate cancer may be more useful for elderly males.
作为大多数西方国家最常被诊断出的癌症以及癌症死亡的第二大主要原因,前列腺癌是一个重大的医疗保健问题。对无症状男性进行常规前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查的引入仍存在争议。为了解决前列腺癌筛查方面的不确定性,美国和欧洲正在进行前瞻性随机对照试验。开发一种最佳的筛查系统可能是前列腺癌筛查最重要的问题之一,其设定不仅应旨在降低前列腺癌的死亡率,还应降低成本。前列腺癌大规模筛查第一步的最佳筛查方式是PSA检测。此外,临界值应以年龄特异性的方式设定。当基线PSA水平较高时,PSA水平为4.0 ng/ml或更低的男性患前列腺癌的风险会增加。因此,对于在筛查第一步中没有前列腺癌可疑发现的男性,应根据基线PSA和直肠指检情况进行重新筛查。在筛查的第二步中,通过移行区体积调整的PSA密度(PSATZD)和游离/总PSA比值(%f-PSA)可能有助于选择应进行活检的患者。然而,PSATZD和%f-PSA的最佳临界值尚未得到证实,应考虑进行年龄调整设定以检测临床意义重大的癌症。前列腺活检方法对于提高前列腺癌的诊断准确性也非常重要。活检针数应根据前列腺体积设定。此外,年轻男性中具有临床意义的肿瘤体积可能比老年男性小。因此,应根据年龄和前列腺体积设定最佳活检针数。未来将有最佳的筛查系统和微创治疗方法,前列腺癌筛查可能对老年男性更有用。