Suppr超能文献

[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术。一项前瞻性随机研究的结果]

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-lap-cholecystectomy. Results of a prospective, randomized study].

作者信息

Kunz R, Orth K, Vogel J, Steinacker J M, Meitinger A, Brückner U, Beger H G

机构信息

Abteilung für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Universität Ulm/Donau.

出版信息

Chirurg. 1992 Apr;63(4):291-5.

PMID:1534528
Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCCE) was gaining acceptance rapidly, when several institutions could demonstrate the safety of this minimal invasive treatment modality. Nevertheless prospective randomised studies still are missing to prove the advantages of this new treatment modality in contrast to open cholecystectomy. 77 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were treated by LCCE (n = 40) or mini-lap CCE (n = 37) in a prospective, randomised study. As preliminary results, there were no differences in duration of anesthesia and operation time, perioperative complications or postoperative need for analgetics. Patients with LCCE had significant less postoperative pain, less restriction of total vital capacity and a shorter postoperative hospital stay as parameters of a diminished operative trauma.

摘要

当几家机构能够证明这种微创治疗方式的安全性时,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LCCE)迅速得到认可。然而,与开腹胆囊切除术相比,仍缺乏前瞻性随机研究来证明这种新治疗方式的优势。在一项前瞻性随机研究中,77例有症状胆结石患者接受了LCCE(n = 40)或迷你腹腔镜CCE(n = 37)治疗。作为初步结果,麻醉持续时间、手术时间、围手术期并发症或术后镇痛需求方面没有差异。以手术创伤减轻的参数衡量,LCCE患者术后疼痛明显减轻,总肺活量受限较少,术后住院时间较短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验