Suppr超能文献

[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术。一项前瞻性随机研究的结果]

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-lap-cholecystectomy. Results of a prospective, randomized study].

作者信息

Kunz R, Orth K, Vogel J, Steinacker J M, Meitinger A, Brückner U, Beger H G

机构信息

Abteilung für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Universität Ulm/Donau.

出版信息

Chirurg. 1992 Apr;63(4):291-5.

PMID:1534528
Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCCE) was gaining acceptance rapidly, when several institutions could demonstrate the safety of this minimal invasive treatment modality. Nevertheless prospective randomised studies still are missing to prove the advantages of this new treatment modality in contrast to open cholecystectomy. 77 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were treated by LCCE (n = 40) or mini-lap CCE (n = 37) in a prospective, randomised study. As preliminary results, there were no differences in duration of anesthesia and operation time, perioperative complications or postoperative need for analgetics. Patients with LCCE had significant less postoperative pain, less restriction of total vital capacity and a shorter postoperative hospital stay as parameters of a diminished operative trauma.

摘要

当几家机构能够证明这种微创治疗方式的安全性时,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LCCE)迅速得到认可。然而,与开腹胆囊切除术相比,仍缺乏前瞻性随机研究来证明这种新治疗方式的优势。在一项前瞻性随机研究中,77例有症状胆结石患者接受了LCCE(n = 40)或迷你腹腔镜CCE(n = 37)治疗。作为初步结果,麻醉持续时间、手术时间、围手术期并发症或术后镇痛需求方面没有差异。以手术创伤减轻的参数衡量,LCCE患者术后疼痛明显减轻,总肺活量受限较少,术后住院时间较短。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验