• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧保护性样本刷检对于呼吸机相关性肺炎的准确诊断是否必要?

Is bilateral protected specimen brush sampling necessary for the accurate diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia?

作者信息

Butler Karyn L, Best Irwin M, Oster Robert A, Katon-Benitez Iva, Lynn Weaver Wm, Bumpers Harvey L

机构信息

Morehouse School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Atlanta, Georgia 30310, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):316-22. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000088858.22080.cb.

DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000088858.22080.cb
PMID:15345979
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical acumen alone is unreliable in establishing a diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and controversy exists over which diagnostic tools should be utilized to confirm a clinical suspicion of VAP. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of blind protected specimen brush (PSB) sampling in the diagnosis of VAP and if bilateral PSB sampling is necessary.

METHODS

Prospective study comparing blind PSB sampling with bronchoscopic directed PSB sampling in thirty-four consecutive SICU patients with a clinical suspicion of VAP. All patients underwent blind PSB sampling followed by bronchoscopic directed contralateral PSB sampling.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 34 patients (71%) were diagnosed to have VAP. The concordance rate between blind and directed PSB samples was 53% (18/34). When blind PSB was positive (15/34), the contralateral sample yielded a different microorganism in three patients (9%). When blind PSB was negative (19/34), infection was present in the contralateral lung in nine patients (26%). Blind PSB sampling alone was inaccurate in 35% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The low concordance between blind and directed PSB suggests the need to sample both lung fields. Bilateral PSB sampling can identify unsuspected pathogenic microorganisms in the contralateral lung.

摘要

背景

仅靠临床敏锐度来诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是不可靠的,并且对于应使用哪些诊断工具来证实临床怀疑的VAP存在争议。本研究的目的是确定盲法保护性标本刷检(PSB)采样在VAP诊断中的可靠性,以及双侧PSB采样是否必要。

方法

前瞻性研究,比较34例临床怀疑VAP的连续入住外科重症监护病房(SICU)患者的盲法PSB采样与支气管镜引导下PSB采样。所有患者均先进行盲法PSB采样,然后进行支气管镜引导下对侧PSB采样。

结果

34例患者中有24例(71%)被诊断为VAP。盲法和引导法PSB样本的一致性率为53%(18/34)。当盲法PSB为阳性时(15/34),对侧样本在3例患者(9%)中检出不同微生物。当盲法PSB为阴性时(共19例,占34例的56%),9例患者(26%)对侧肺存在感染。仅采用盲法PSB采样时,35%的患者诊断不准确。

结论

盲法和引导法PSB之间的低一致性表明需要对双侧肺野进行采样。双侧PSB采样可识别对侧肺中未被怀疑的致病微生物。

相似文献

1
Is bilateral protected specimen brush sampling necessary for the accurate diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia?双侧保护性样本刷检对于呼吸机相关性肺炎的准确诊断是否必要?
J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):316-22. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000088858.22080.cb.
2
"Blind" protected specimen brushing versus bronchoscopic techniques in the aetiolological diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.“盲法”保护性标本刷检与支气管镜技术在呼吸机相关性肺炎病因诊断中的应用
Eur Respir J. 1996 Jul;9(7):1494-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09071494.
3
Bronchoscopic or blind sampling techniques for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.用于诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎的支气管镜或盲法采样技术。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Dec;152(6 Pt 1):1982-91. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520766.
4
Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in cancer patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a prospective comparison of the plugged telescoping catheter with the protected specimen brush.机械通气的癌症患者医院获得性肺炎的诊断:带塞可伸缩导管与防污染样本毛刷的前瞻性比较
Chest. 1999 Jun;115(6):1641-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.6.1641.
5
A comparison of bronchoscopic vs blind protected specimen brush sampling in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Chest. 1995 Jul;108(1):203-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.1.203.
6
Implementation of bronchoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia to reduce antibiotic use.在呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断中实施支气管镜技术以减少抗生素使用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Dec;156(6):1820-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.6.9610117.
7
The diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a comparison of histologic, microbiologic, and clinical criteria.呼吸机相关性肺炎的诊断:组织学、微生物学及临床标准的比较
Chest. 1997 Aug;112(2):445-57. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.2.445.
8
Blind protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in ventilated children.通气儿童的盲法保护样本刷检和支气管肺泡灌洗术
Crit Care Med. 1999 Nov;27(11):2537-43. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199911000-00035.
9
Quantitative tracheal lavage versus bronchoscopic protected specimen brush for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients.定量气管灌洗与支气管镜保护性标本刷检在机械通气患者医院获得性肺炎诊断中的应用比较
Am J Surg. 2003 Dec;186(6):591-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.08.005.
10
The significance of distal bronchial samples with commensals in ventilator-associated pneumonia: colonizer or pathogen?呼吸机相关性肺炎中含有共生菌的远端支气管样本的意义:定植菌还是病原菌?
Chest. 2002 Oct;122(4):1389-99. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.4.1389.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the UK: report of the working party on hospital-acquired pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.英国医院获得性肺炎管理指南:英国抗菌化疗协会医院获得性肺炎工作组报告
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Jul;62(1):5-34. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn162. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
2
Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review of the literature.呼吸机相关性肺炎的诊断:文献系统综述
Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R56. doi: 10.1186/cc6877. Epub 2008 Apr 21.