Rubin G, Wortman M, Kouides P A
Rochester General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Rochester, NY 14621, USA.
Haemophilia. 2004 Sep;10(5):477-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00915.x.
Endometrial ablation has recently gained popularity as a treatment of menorrhagia in the general population. In the von Willebrand disease (VWD) patient, intuitively, it would appear that the failure rate would be higher because of the underlying hypocoaguability increasing the likelihood for re-bleeding. In a consecutive series of seven patients, we assessed the efficacy and safety of endometrial ablation in VWD-related menorrhagia.
We performed a retrospective analysis using chart review and a 21-item questionnaire administered to seven (six type 1, one type 2A) women who underwent endometrial ablation between the years 1997 and 2001. Parameters assessed included operative complications, the development of abdominal pains, recurrence of menstrual bleeding post-ablation and the change in the pre-/post-ablation quality of life (QOL). Three patients underwent endomyometrial resection and one each underwent rollerball, thermal, electrocautery and balloon ablation. All patients were pre-treated with i.v. desmopressin (DDAVP) except the 2A patient who received Humate P. Mean age of the patient was 41 +/- 6 years and follow-up was for 45 months (range 31-73) post-ablation.
No significant perioperative bleeding complications were observed in any of the patients. All patients initially responded (two amenorrhoea, four hypomenorrhoea, one moderate improvement). In all patients, QOL assessed by 10 parameters improved significantly following the ablation procedure, regardless of the specific technique used. However, at the end of follow-up, only one patient remained amenorrheic, one was hypomenorrheic, one had moderate improvement and four patients experienced recurrence of menorrhagia, three eventually requiring a hysterectomy at a median of 11 months post-ablation.
Endometrial ablation appears to be a safe procedure that improves the QOL in patients with VWD-related menorrhagia. However, its long-term efficacy appears to be lower in VWD patients when compared with women with menorrhagia without VWD.
子宫内膜消融术近来在普通人群中作为治疗月经过多的方法而受到欢迎。对于血管性血友病(VWD)患者,直观地看,由于潜在的低凝状态增加了再次出血的可能性,其失败率似乎会更高。在连续的7例患者中,我们评估了子宫内膜消融术治疗VWD相关性月经过多的疗效和安全性。
我们进行了一项回顾性分析,采用病历审查和一份21项的问卷,该问卷发给了1997年至2001年间接受子宫内膜消融术的7名女性(6名1型,1名2A型)。评估的参数包括手术并发症、腹痛的发生、消融术后月经出血的复发以及消融术前/后生活质量(QOL)的变化。3例患者接受了子宫内膜肌层切除术,1例分别接受了滚球消融、热消融、电灼消融和球囊消融。除1例2A型患者接受人凝血因子Ⅷ外,所有患者术前均静脉注射去氨加压素(DDAVP)。患者的平均年龄为41±6岁,消融术后随访45个月(范围31 - 73个月)。
所有患者均未观察到明显的围手术期出血并发症。所有患者最初均有反应(2例闭经,4例月经过少,1例中度改善)。在所有患者中,无论采用何种具体技术,通过10项参数评估的生活质量在消融术后均有显著改善。然而,在随访结束时,只有1例患者仍闭经,1例月经过少,1例中度改善,4例患者月经过多复发,3例最终在消融术后中位时间11个月时需要进行子宫切除术。
子宫内膜消融术似乎是一种安全的手术,可改善VWD相关性月经过多患者的生活质量。然而,与无VWD的月经过多女性相比,其在VWD患者中的长期疗效似乎较低。