El-Nashar Sherif A, Hopkins Matthew R, Feitoza Simone S, Pruthi Rajiv K, Barnes Sunni A, Gebhart John B, Cliby William A, Famuyide Abimbola O
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1381-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000265805.76453.33.
To evaluate the efficacy of global endometrial ablation in women with bleeding disorders who presented with menorrhagia.
A records-linkage system was used to construct a retrospective cohort of 41 women with bleeding disorders (coagulopathy) and a reference group of 111 randomly selected women without bleeding disorders from a pool of 943 women who underwent global endometrial ablation (with thermal balloon ablation technology or bipolar radiofrequency ablation technology) for menorrhagia at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) from January 1995 through December 2005. Demographic data, type of global endometrial ablation therapy and reablation, and hysterectomy data were extracted from the database.
There was no significant difference in baseline age, parity, body mass index, uterine size, type of global endometrial ablation therapy, or duration of follow-up between the groups. Two women (5%) in the coagulopathy group had hysterectomy or reablation, compared with 8 (7%) in the reference group (Fisher exact test, P=.728). A Kaplan-Meier plot showed no difference in the time to treatment failure between the groups (log-rank test, P=.534). Procedural-related complications were generally minor and infrequent (9 of 152 [6%]). Complications were equally distributed in the coagulopathy (4 of 41) and reference groups (6 of 111) (Fisher exact test, P=.267).
Global endometrial ablation is an effective treatment choice for women with coagulopathy presenting with menorrhagia.
评估全球子宫内膜切除术对患有出血性疾病且月经过多女性的疗效。
采用记录链接系统,从1995年1月至2005年12月在梅奥诊所(明尼苏达州罗切斯特)接受全球子宫内膜切除术(采用热球囊消融技术或双极射频消融技术)治疗月经过多的943名女性中,构建一个回顾性队列,其中包括41名患有出血性疾病(凝血障碍)的女性和111名从无出血性疾病的女性中随机选取的参照组。从数据库中提取人口统计学数据、全球子宫内膜切除治疗类型及再次消融情况,以及子宫切除术数据。
两组之间在基线年龄、产次、体重指数、子宫大小、全球子宫内膜切除治疗类型或随访时间方面无显著差异。凝血障碍组中有2名女性(5%)接受了子宫切除术或再次消融,而参照组中有8名女性(7%)(Fisher精确检验,P = 0.728)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示两组之间治疗失败时间无差异(对数秩检验,P = 0.534)。与手术相关的并发症一般较轻且不常见(152例中有9例[6%])。并发症在凝血障碍组(41例中有4例)和参照组(111例中有6例)中分布相同(Fisher精确检验,P = 0.267)。
全球子宫内膜切除术是患有凝血障碍且月经过多女性的一种有效治疗选择。