Stahl Stephen M., Pradko James F., Haight Barbara R., Modell Jack G., Rockett Carol B., Learned-Coughlin Susan
Neuroscience Education Institute, University of California, San Diego; Bay Pointe Depression Clinic, New Baltimore, the Department of Family Practice, Mt. Clemens General Hospital, Mt. Clemens, and St. John Hospital, Detroit, Mich.; and GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;6(4):159-166. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v06n0403.
The neurochemical and biological effects of antidepressant medications have become better defined over the last decade. When the anti-depressant bupropion was introduced in the United States in 1989, the specific pharmacologic basis of its clinical effects was uncertain. Research conducted over the past decade has significantly advanced the understanding of the neuropharmacology of bupropion and has demonstrated a novel mechanism of antidepressant activity. This article discusses the mechanism of action of bupropion and relates the drug's neuropharmacologic effects to its clinical efficacy and tolerability profiles. DATA SOURCES: Data were obtained via the MEDLINE database in an English-language search spanning the period 1965 to May 2002 and using the search terms bupropion, bupropion SR, and antidepressants, as well as from the manufacturer's bupropion databases. CONCLUSIONS: The preclinical and clinical data show that bupropion acts via dual inhibition of norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake and is devoid of clinically significant serotonergic effects or direct effects on postsynaptic receptors. Dual norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibition is associated with a unique clinical profile. Bupropion has demonstrated efficacy comparable to that of other antidepressants. However, because bupropion is a selective norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor with no serotonergic activity, common antidepressant-associated side effects, such as sexual dysfunction, weight gain, and sedation, are not associated with bupropion therapy.
在过去十年中,抗抑郁药物的神经化学和生物学效应已得到更明确的界定。1989年抗抑郁药安非他酮在美国上市时,其临床效应的具体药理学基础尚不确定。过去十年进行的研究显著推进了对安非他酮神经药理学的理解,并证明了一种新的抗抑郁活性机制。本文讨论了安非他酮的作用机制,并将该药物的神经药理学效应与其临床疗效和耐受性特征联系起来。
通过MEDLINE数据库进行英文检索获得数据,检索时间跨度为1965年至2002年5月,检索词为安非他酮、缓释安非他酮和抗抑郁药,同时也从该药物制造商的数据库中获取数据。
临床前和临床数据表明,安非他酮通过双重抑制去甲肾上腺素和多巴胺再摄取发挥作用,且没有临床上显著的血清素能效应或对突触后受体的直接效应。双重去甲肾上腺素和多巴胺再摄取抑制与独特的临床特征相关。安非他酮已证明其疗效与其他抗抑郁药相当。然而,由于安非他酮是一种选择性去甲肾上腺素和多巴胺再摄取抑制剂,无血清素能活性,常见的与抗抑郁药相关的副作用,如性功能障碍、体重增加和镇静作用,与安非他酮治疗无关。