Suppr超能文献

老年男性雄激素缺乏症(ADAM)问卷在识别社区居住老年男性志愿者性腺功能减退方面的应用价值。

Interest of the androgen deficiency in aging males (ADAM) questionnaire for the identification of hypogonadism in elderly community-dwelling male volunteers.

作者信息

Tancredi Annalisa, Reginster Jean-Yves, Schleich Florence, Pire Georges, Maassen Philippe, Luyckx Francoise, Legros Jean-Jacques

机构信息

WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspect of Osteoarticular Disorders, Liege, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Endocrinol. 2004 Sep;151(3):355-60. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1510355.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To date, serum free testosterone measurement is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of hypogonadism in elderly males but it is not available to all subjects suspected of a decrease in testicular function. Therefore, we evaluated whether the Androgen Deficiency in Aging Males (ADAM) questionnaire, in its original or in a modified 'quantitative' version (qADAM), could be used as a surrogate to biochemical determinations for the identification of hypogonadism in elderly males.

METHODS

5028 men, aged 50-70 years, spontaneously consulting for the assessment of their gonadal function were studied. ADAM and qADAM, allocating a value of 1 point for any positive answer to each of the 10 questions of the ADAM test, were assessed for their ability to discriminate between males with free testosterone levels below or above 70 ng/l.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the ADAM score were 81% and 21.6% respectively. The use of ADAM resulted in an appropriate classification of our population in normal or hypogonadal subjects in 44.5% of the cases. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the qADAM (0.529) revealed a highly marginal interest of this quantitative approach compared with the original scoring system.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADAM test has a high sensitivity to identify aging males with low free testosterone levels. However, due to its lack of specificity, this test cannot be used as a surrogate to serum free testosterone testing for the identification of androgen deficiency in elderly, community-dwelling males.

摘要

目的

迄今为止,血清游离睾酮测定被认为是老年男性性腺功能减退诊断的金标准,但并非所有怀疑睾丸功能减退的受试者都能进行此项检测。因此,我们评估了老年男性雄激素缺乏症(ADAM)问卷原版或改良的“量化”版本(qADAM)是否可作为生化检测的替代方法,用于识别老年男性性腺功能减退。

方法

对5028名年龄在50至70岁之间、因性腺功能评估而自发前来咨询的男性进行了研究。ADAM问卷和qADAM问卷中,ADAM测试的10个问题中任何一个阳性答案都赋值1分,评估它们区分游离睾酮水平低于或高于70 ng/l男性的能力。

结果

ADAM评分的敏感性和特异性分别为81%和21.6%。使用ADAM问卷能够在44.5%的病例中将我们的研究人群正确分类为正常或性腺功能减退受试者。qADAM问卷的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.529,与原始评分系统相比,该量化方法的实用价值非常有限。

结论

ADAM测试对于识别游离睾酮水平低的老年男性具有较高的敏感性。然而,由于其缺乏特异性,该测试不能作为血清游离睾酮检测的替代方法,用于识别社区居住老年男性的雄激素缺乏症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验