Cabral Renan Desimon, Busin Luciane, Rosito Tiago Elias, Koff Walter José
Urology Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul , Porto Algre , Brazil.
Aging Male. 2014 Sep;17(3):147-54. doi: 10.3109/13685538.2014.908460. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
At present, calculated free testosterone assessment is considered as the gold standard in diagnosing male hypogonadism. However, this assessment is not available for all the individuals diagnosed with decreased testicular function. The investigators of this study were, thus, prompted to evaluate whether the androgen deficiency in the aging male (ADAM) and the Massachusetts Male Ageing Study (MMAS) questionnaires could be used to replace biochemical parameters in the diagnosis for hypogonadism in men aged 40 years and above.
We evaluated 460 men, aged 40 years and above, all volunteers of a screening program for prostate cancer based at the Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre. In this study, we assessed the efficiency of the ADAM and MMAS questionnaires in diagnosing Brazilian men with low levels of total, calculated free and bioavailable testosterone.
The sensitivity of the ADAM questionnaire in diagnosing the calculated free testosterone was 73.6%, whereas specificity was 31.9%. ADAM could be used to properly classify our cohort into normal or hypogonadal individuals in 52.75% of the cases. The sensitivity of the MMAS questionnaire was 59.9%, whereas the specificity was 42.9%, resulting in a successful classification of 51.4% of the patients.
The ADAM and MMAS questionnaires showed adequate sensitivity in diagnosing male patients with low levels of free testosterone. However, because of the lack of specificity, these tools cannot replace calculated free testosterone assessments in men aged 40 years and above.
目前,计算游离睾酮评估被视为诊断男性性腺功能减退的金标准。然而,并非所有被诊断为睾丸功能减退的个体都能进行这种评估。因此,本研究的研究者们着手评估衰老男性雄激素缺乏(ADAM)问卷和马萨诸塞男性衰老研究(MMAS)问卷是否可用于替代40岁及以上男性性腺功能减退诊断中的生化参数。
我们评估了460名40岁及以上的男性,他们均是阿雷格里港临床医院前列腺癌筛查项目的志愿者。在本研究中,我们评估了ADAM问卷和MMAS问卷在诊断巴西男性总睾酮、计算游离睾酮和生物可利用睾酮水平较低方面的效率。
ADAM问卷诊断计算游离睾酮的敏感性为73.6%,而特异性为31.9%。ADAM可在52.75%的病例中将我们的队列正确分类为正常或性腺功能减退个体。MMAS问卷的敏感性为59.9%,而特异性为42.9%,成功分类了51.4%的患者。
ADAM问卷和MMAS问卷在诊断游离睾酮水平较低的男性患者时显示出足够的敏感性。然而,由于缺乏特异性,这些工具不能替代40岁及以上男性的计算游离睾酮评估。