Talwalkar Nirupama G, Earle Nan R, Earle Elizabeth Ann, Lawrie Gerald M
The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3):709-15. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.709.
This retrospective study was performed to examine the outcome of mitral valve repair (ie, mitral valvuloplasty [MVP]) in relation to preoperative low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
From our series of 338 consecutive patients who underwent MVP between 1983 and 2001, we compared the course of 302 patients with preoperative LVEF of > 35% (group I) to that of 36 patients with LVEF of </= 35% (group II).
Preoperatively, group II patients were more likely to be associated with ischemic heart disease (IHD) [p < 0.0002], and to have undergone emergency surgery (p < 0.02) and concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) [p < 0.02]. The perioperative mortality rate was 8% for group II and 2% for group I (p < 0.03). On multivariate analysis, predictors of increased operative mortality were emergent operation (p < 0.001) and preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV (p < 0.02). Predictors of overall mortality (early and late) included emergency operation (p < 0.02), preoperative NYHA class IV (p < 0.002), and IHD (p < 0.0001). Postoperatively, 78% of patients from both groups were in NYHA class I/II. The 5-year rate of freedom from reoperation was 89%. The estimated overall 5-year survival rate (early and late) was 82% for group I and 54% for group II (p < 0.02), and when associated with prior CABG, prior myocardial infarction, or concomitant CABG, it was 0%, 37%, and 63%, respectively, in group II.
Good symptomatic relief and acceptable overall survival can be obtained in patients in both groups after they have undergone MVP, in the absence of serious comorbidities. Preoperative NYHA class IV and end-stage IHD increase early and late mortality, particularly in group II patients, in whom surgery may be a salvage effort only. Prognosis is dismal in group II patients who have previously undergone CABG. In chronic cases, an early referral for MVP electively before deterioration to end-stage heart disease would improve survival even in patients with low LVEF.
本回顾性研究旨在探讨二尖瓣修复术(即二尖瓣成形术[MVP])与术前左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低之间的关系。
在我们1983年至2001年连续接受MVP手术的338例患者中,我们将302例术前LVEF>35%的患者(I组)与36例LVEF≤35%的患者(II组)的病程进行了比较。
术前,II组患者更易合并缺血性心脏病(IHD)[p<0.0002],且更可能接受急诊手术(p<0.02)和同期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)[p<0.02]。II组围手术期死亡率为8%,I组为2%(p<0.03)。多因素分析显示,手术死亡率增加的预测因素为急诊手术(p<0.001)和术前纽约心脏协会(NYHA)IV级(p<0.02)。总体死亡率(早期和晚期)的预测因素包括急诊手术(p<0.02)、术前NYHA IV级(p<0.002)和IHD(p<0.0001)。术后,两组78%的患者为NYHA I/II级。再次手术的5年无复发生存率为89%。I组估计的总体5年生存率(早期和晚期)为82%,II组为54%(p<0.02),在II组中,若合并既往CABG、既往心肌梗死或同期CABG,其生存率分别为0%、37%和63%。
在无严重合并症的情况下,两组患者接受MVP手术后均可获得良好的症状缓解和可接受的总体生存率。术前NYHA IV级和终末期IHD会增加早期和晚期死亡率,尤其是II组患者,手术可能仅为挽救生命的措施。既往接受过CABG的II组患者预后不佳。在慢性病例中,对于LVEF较低的患者,在病情恶化至终末期心脏病之前尽早择期转诊行MVP手术可提高生存率。