Occhipinti Elise, Correa Hernan, Yu Lolie, Craver Randall
Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Mar;44(3):240-4. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20174.
The category, cytology, cytogenetics (CCC) system for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and the pediatric WHO system for MDS/myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) have recently been proposed to characterize these diseases in pediatrics.
We compare the CCC and pediatric WHO systems against each other and against the French, American, British (FAB) and adult WHO classifications in order to determine which more accurately classifies these diseases and predicts outcome.
An 18-year retrospective review identified patients less than 18 years of age meeting CCC and/or pediatric WHO criteria for the diagnosis of MDS or MPD. Resolution, stability, progression, and death in the subcategories of each system were compared.
Twenty-eight patients were included in the study. Pediatric WHO: 17 patients met criteria, 10 died. Eight developed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (seven died), one juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) (died), one chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) (currently in relapse), two died of complications, two responded to BMT, three have stable disease, one resolved. Eleven patients were not classifiable by the pediatric WHO system, one of which progressed to AML and died. CCC: 26 patients met criteria, 9 died. Nine developed AML (8 died), 1 died of complications, 10 responded to treatment (BMT and/or chemotherapy). Four are stable without treatment, two resolved. Two patients with MPD were not classifiable by the CCC system.
Both the pediatric WHO and CCC systems are better able to classify MDS in children than the adult WHO and FAB classifications. The pediatric WHO system is more exclusive. Children meeting these criteria are more likely to progress to AML or death. The restrictive nature of the pediatric WHO system was unable to classify one case of fatal MDS. The CCC system is more inclusive and can stratify patients into a neutral or poor prognosis based upon outcome. However, the CCC system ignores those diseases with a myeloprolifferative component. This resulted in two cases of MPD that were unclassifiable by the CCC system. One of these patients died, the other is currently in relapse.
最近提出了用于骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的类别、细胞学、细胞遗传学(CCC)系统以及用于儿童MDS/骨髓增殖性疾病(MPD)的儿童世界卫生组织(WHO)系统,以对儿科中的这些疾病进行特征描述。
我们将CCC系统和儿童WHO系统相互比较,并与法国、美国、英国(FAB)和成人WHO分类进行比较,以确定哪种分类能更准确地对这些疾病进行分类并预测预后。
进行了一项为期18年的回顾性研究,纳入年龄小于18岁且符合CCC和/或儿童WHO诊断MDS或MPD标准的患者。比较了每个系统子类别中的缓解、稳定性、进展和死亡情况。
28例患者纳入研究。儿童WHO系统:17例符合标准,10例死亡。8例发展为急性髓系白血病(AML)(7例死亡),1例青少年骨髓单核细胞白血病(JMML)(死亡),1例慢性骨髓单核细胞白血病(CMML)(目前复发),2例死于并发症,2例对异基因造血干细胞移植(BMT)有反应,3例病情稳定,1例缓解。11例患者无法用儿童WHO系统分类,其中1例进展为AML并死亡。CCC系统:26例符合标准,9例死亡。9例发展为AML(8例死亡),1例死于并发症,10例对治疗(BMT和/或化疗)有反应。4例未经治疗病情稳定,2例缓解。2例MPD患者无法用CCC系统分类。
儿童WHO系统和CCC系统在对儿童MDS进行分类方面均优于成人WHO系统和FAB分类。儿童WHO系统更具排他性。符合这些标准的儿童更有可能进展为AML或死亡。儿童WHO系统的限制性无法对1例致命性MDS进行分类。CCC系统更具包容性,可根据预后将患者分为预后中性或不良。然而,CCC系统忽略了具有骨髓增殖成分的疾病。这导致2例MPD患者无法用CCC系统分类。其中1例患者死亡,另1例目前复发。